Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Different Stages of Liquid Manure Management Chains: Abatement Options and Emission Interactions

被引:78
|
作者
Sajeev, Erangu Purath Mohankumar [1 ,2 ]
Winiwarter, Wilfried [3 ,4 ]
Amon, Barbara [5 ]
机构
[1] Graz Univ, Inst Syst Sci Innovat & Sustainabil Res ISIS, Graz, Austria
[2] Graz Univ, FWF DK Climate Change, Graz, Austria
[3] IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria
[4] Univ Zielona Gora, Inst Environm Engn, Zielona Gora, Poland
[5] Leibniz Inst Agr Engn & Bioecon ATB, Potsdam, Germany
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
DIETARY CRUDE PROTEIN; NITROUS-OXIDE; PIG SLURRY; DAIRY MANURE; NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE; METHANE EMISSIONS; HYDROGEN-SULFIDE; CATTLE SLURRY; ANIMAL SLURRY;
D O I
10.2134/jeq2017.05.0199
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Farm livestock manure is an important source of ammonia and greenhouse gases. Concerns over the environmental impact of emissions from manure management have resulted in research efforts focusing on emission abatement. However, questions regarding the successful abatement of manure-related emissions remain. This study uses a meta-analytical approach comprising 89 peer-reviewed studies to quantify emission reduction potentials of abatement options for liquid manure management chains from cattle and pigs. Analyses of emission reductions highlight the importance of accounting for interactions between emissions. Only three out of the eight abatement options considered (frequent removal of manure, anaerobic digesters, and manure acidification) reduced ammonia (3-60%), nitrous oxide (21-55%), and methane (29-74%) emissions simultaneously, whereas in all other cases, tradeoffs were identified. The results demonstrate that a shift from single-stage emission abatement options towards a whole-chain perspective is vital in reducing overall emissions along the manure management chain. The study also identifies some key elements like proper clustering, reporting of influencing factors, and explicitly describing assumptions associated with abatement options that can reduce variability in emission reduction estimates. Prioritization of abatement options according to their functioning can help to determine low-risk emission reduction options, specifically options that alter manure characteristics (e.g., reduced protein diets, anaerobic digestion, or slurry acidification). These insights supported by comprehensive emission measurement studies can help improve the effectiveness of emission abatement and harmonize strategies aimed at reducing air pollution and climate change simultaneously.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:30 / 41
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions - management options and abatement cost
    Kajaste, Raili
    Hurme, Markku
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 4041 - 4052
  • [2] Influence of diet and manure management on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from dairy barns
    Edouard, N.
    Charpiot, A.
    Robin, P.
    Lorinquer, E.
    Dolle, J-B
    Faverdin, P.
    ANIMAL, 2019, 13 (12) : 2903 - 2912
  • [3] Mitigating Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Swine Manure Management: A System Analysis
    Wang, Yue
    Dong, Hongmin
    Zhu, Zhiping
    Gerber, Pierre J.
    Xin, Hongwei
    Smith, Pete
    Opio, Carolyn
    Steinfeld, Henning
    Chadwick, Dave
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (08) : 4503 - 4511
  • [4] Greenhouse gas emissions from different pig manure management techniques: a critical analysis
    Conor Dennehy
    Peadar G. Lawlor
    Yan Jiang
    Gillian E. Gardiner
    Sihuang Xie
    Long D. Nghiem
    Xinmin Zhan
    Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2017, 11
  • [5] Greenhouse gas emissions from different pig manure management techniques: a critical analysis
    Dennehy, Conor
    Lawlor, Peadar G.
    Jiang, Yan
    Gardiner, Gillian E.
    Xie, Sihuang
    Nghiem, Long D.
    Zhan, Xinmin
    FRONTIERS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2017, 11 (03)
  • [6] AMMONIA AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY MANURE DURING STORAGE
    Zhu, Z.
    Li, L.
    Dong, H.
    Wang, Y.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2020, 63 (06) : 1723 - 1733
  • [7] Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions of different types of livestock and poultry manure during storage
    Zhu Z.
    Li L.
    Dong H.
    Wang Y.
    Transactions of the ASABE, 2020, 63 (06): : 1723 - 1733
  • [8] Influence of rearing conditions and manure management practices on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from poultry houses
    Meda, B.
    Hassouna, M.
    Aubert, C.
    Robin, P.
    Dourmad, J. Y.
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2011, 67 (03) : 441 - 455
  • [9] Compaction effects on greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from solid dairy manure
    Chang, Fangle
    Fabian-Wheeler, Eileen
    Richard, Tom L.
    Hile, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 332
  • [10] Costs and benefits of ammonia and particulate matter abatement in German agriculture including interactions with greenhouse gas emissions
    Wagner, Susanne
    Angenendt, Elisabeth
    Beletskaya, Olga
    Zeddies, Juergen
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 141 : 58 - 68