6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays

被引:0
|
作者
Hayashi, M [1 ]
Tsuchitani, Y [1 ]
Miura, M [1 ]
Takeshige, F [1 ]
Ebisu, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Conservat Dent, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the quality of fired ceramic inlay restorations consisting of a feldspathic porcelain system (G-Cera Cosmotech II) after 6 years in vivo. A total of 49 fired ceramic inlays (for 27 premolars and 22 molars: class 1 in 11 teeth, class 2 in 36 teeth, and onlays in two teeth) were placed in 29 patients, and all restorations were evaluated at the time of placement, at 6 months, and 1, 2, 4, and 6 years after placement using modified USPHS criteria. Replicas made of the restorations were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to assess the state of the marginal area and wear of the restoration. Favorable color match was noted, and no bulk fracture, tooth fracture, or missing restorations were detected. Longevity was observed in 92% of the fired ceramic inlay restorations at 6 years (Kaplan-Meier method); however, marginal fracture was detected in six restorations (13%) and marginal discoloration in 11 (23%). SEM evaluation disclosed marginal microfracture in 49% of the restorations, wear in 19%, and wear of resin cement along margins in 36% at 6 years. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of each of these three characteristics between molars and premolars. This longitudinal 6-year clinical observation suggested that fired ceramic inlay restorations made by the G-Cera Cosmotech II system are aesthetic, durable, and clinically acceptable. Further follow-up is needed for the restorations showing marginal degradation and fracture from a microscopic and macroscopic perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 326
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up
    van Dijken, JWV
    Hoglund-Aberg, C
    Olofsson, AL
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1998, 26 (03) : 219 - 225
  • [2] Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays
    Hayashi, M
    Tsuchitani, Y
    Kawamura, Y
    Miura, M
    Takeshige, F
    Ebisu, S
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2000, 25 (06) : 473 - 481
  • [3] 8-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays
    Hayashi, M
    Miura, M
    Nishimura, N
    Kawamura, Y
    Ebisu, S
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 184 - 184
  • [4] Three year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays
    Manhart, J
    Chen, HY
    Neuerer, P
    Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner, A
    Hickel, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2001, 14 (02): : 95 - 99
  • [5] Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations: 6-year report
    Pallesen, U
    CAD/CIM IN AESTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1996, : 241 - 253
  • [6] Six-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays
    Galiatsatos, Aristidis A.
    Bergou, Dimitra
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 39 (05): : 407 - 412
  • [7] 2-YEAR CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF CERAMIC INLAYS
    BROOME, JC
    TROIANI, LK
    LEINFELDER, KF
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 191 - 191
  • [8] A 3-year clinical evaluation of Cerana prefabricated ceramic inlays
    Ödman, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2002, 15 (01) : 79 - 82
  • [9] Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays after one year.
    Santos, MJC
    Navarro, MFL
    Francischone, CE
    Lopes, LG
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 130 - 130
  • [10] Four-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays.
    Manhart, J
    Chen, HY
    Albrecht, A
    Neuerer, P
    Hickel, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A332 - A332