Intraoperative Fluorescence Angiography in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Identifying Risk Factors and Outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Samuel, Ankhita R. [1 ]
Stranix, John T. [1 ]
DeGeorge, Brent R., Jr. [1 ]
Black, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Campbell, Chris A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Plast Surg, Box 800376, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; mastectomy; angiography; alloplastic; autologous; SKIN FLAP NECROSIS; INDOCYANINE GREEN ANGIOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; PREDICT; VIABILITY; DYE;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003215
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Intraoperative fluorescence angiography (FA) has been described as a useful adjunct to physical examination in predicting mastectomy skin flap viability for immediate breast reconstruction. Its use has been described as a screening tool for mastectomy skin flap viability as well as a test used only for patients at high risk for mastectomy skin flap loss. We performed a national database review of implant-based breast reconstruction surgeries to determine the practice patterns of FA in this patient cohort and to determine if this technology impacted clinical outcomes. Methods A national insurance claims database was reviewed to select patients having undergone direct-to-implant (DTI) and immediate tissue expander (TE) placement with and without intraoperative FA as well as patients who had FA at the time of mastectomy without reconstruction. Patient characteristics that prompted FA and postoperative outcomes with and without FA were evaluated to determine its clinical impact in the observed practice pattern. Results Of the 48,464 patients identified, 836 had FA. More than twice as many patients undergoing DTI had FA than patients undergoing immediate TE placement (10.4% vs 5%, P < 0.0001). Twelve percent of patients receiving FA at the time of mastectomy had reconstruction delayed. Fluorescence angiography was associated with a trend toward lower overall complication rates in DTI patients (8.0% vs 11.9% without FA) but a significantly higher overall complication rate with immediate TE placement (13.8% vs 10.5% without FA, P = 0.018) and was associated with higher reoperation (12.0% vs 8.3% without FA, P = 0.037) in the TE group. There was no difference in other individual complications, readmission, or explantation for either clinical group with and without FA. Regression analysis identified obesity (odds ratio, 1.32; P < 0.001) and younger age (odds ratio, 1.74; P < 0.001) to be associated with performing FA, whereas obesity, diabetes, and tobacco use were associated with higher complication rates. Conclusions Younger and otherwise healthier obese patients were more likely to have FA. A greater proportion of DTI patients had FA than TE patients with improved outcomes in the former group and worse outcomes in the latter group. Obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes were associated with worse outcomes, whereas only obesity was associated with FA use.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying risk factors for postoperative major complications in staged implant-based breast reconstruction with AlloDerm
    Remington, Austin C.
    Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
    Wan, Derrick C.
    Nguyen, Dung
    Momeni, Arash
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (04): : 597 - 603
  • [2] The effects of prolonged intraoperative hypothermia on patient outcomes in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction
    Prabhu, Shamit S.
    Driscoll, Cassandra R.
    Davidson, Amelia L.
    Peoples, Abigail E.
    Katz, Adam J.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 77 : 1 - 7
  • [3] Risk factors for complications in prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
    Sinnott, Catherine
    Pronovost, Mary
    Hodyl, Christine
    Lynch, Melanie
    Young, Freya
    Edwards, Sanford
    Young, Anke Ott
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 1) : 94 - 95
  • [4] Timing of radiation and outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction
    Kearney, Aaron M.
    Brown, Matthew S.
    Soltanian, Hooman T.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2015, 68 (12): : 1719 - 1726
  • [5] Local Audit on Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Outcomes
    Yow, Lina
    Haider, Muhammad
    Abou Samra, Walid
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 56 - 57
  • [6] Timing of radiation and outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction
    Schaverien, M. V.
    Shaitelman, S. F.
    BREAST DISEASES, 2016, 27 (04): : 301 - 302
  • [7] Impact of Intraoperative Hypothermia on Incidence of Infection in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Andersen, Emily S.
    Chishom, Taylor Ann
    Rankin, Jackson
    Juan, Hui Yu
    Coots, Lesley
    Mountziaris, Paschalia M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 153 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [8] Modifiable Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Factors and Impact on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Outcomes
    Barnes, Laura L.
    Chew, Jessica
    Lem, Melinda
    Park, Catherine
    Yang, Joanna C.
    Prionas, Nicolas
    Piper, Merisa
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 153 (05) : 1000 - 1009
  • [9] Risk factors of local recurrence following implant-based breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients
    Miwa Fujihara
    Rie Yamasaki
    Mitsuya Ito
    Tadahiko Shien
    Reina Maeda
    Takanori Kin
    Ayako Ueno
    Yukiko Kajiwara
    Kensuke Kawasaki
    Kouichi Ichimura
    Hiroya Mihara
    Naritaka Kimura
    Shoichiro Ohtani
    BMC Women's Health, 21
  • [10] The Skin Necrosis Conundrum: Examining Long-term Outcomes and Risk Factors in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Hassan, Abbas M.
    Elias, Alexandra M.
    Nguyen, Huan T.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Butler, Charles E.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2023, 43 (11) : NP898 - NP907