The use of implant-level connection in screw-retained fixed partial dentures: A 3-year randomised clinical trial

被引:7
|
作者
Toia, Marco [1 ]
Stocchero, Michele [1 ]
Galli, Silvia [2 ]
Papia, Evaggelia [3 ]
Wennerberg, Ann [4 ]
Becktor, Jonas P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Oral Med, Carl Gustavs Vag 34, SE-20506 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Prosthodont, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Malmo Univ, Fac Odontol, Dept Mat Sci & Technol, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Prosthodont, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
abutment-; implant level; dental implant abutment connection; dental implant-abutment design; osseointegration; IMMEDIATELY LOADED IMPLANTS; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ABUTMENT CONNECTIONS; CONSENSUS REPORT; BONE CHANGES; PROSTHESES; MISFIT; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/clr.13867
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This randomised controlled trial compares the 3-year outcomes, that is, marginal bone-level (MBL) changes and clinical parameters, between an abutment-level (AL) and implant-level (IL) connection for implants with an internal conical connection (ICC) supporting a screw-retained fixed partial denture. Material and methods Fifty patients with 119 implants were randomly allocated to either the AL or IL group. Radiographic and clinical examinations were performed after one, two, and 3 years. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the differences between groups. Results The MBL change was not significantly different between the groups at any point. The MBL was 0.12 +/- 0.31 mm (AL) and 0.23 +/- 0.26 mm (IL) after 1 year; 0.15 +/- 0.34 mm (AL) and 0.17 +/- 0.22 mm (IL) after 2 years; 0.18 +/- 0.39 mm (AL) and 0.15 +/- 0.21 mm (IL) after 3 years. The bleeding on probing was 43.44 +/- 39.24% (AL) and 58.19 +/- 41.20% (IL) after 1 year; 35.78 +/- 39.22% (AL) and 50.43 +/- 41.49% (IL) after 2 years; 51.27 +/- 44.63% (AL) and 49.57 +/- 37.31% (IL) after 3 years and was significantly different (p = .025) between 1 and 2 years. The probing depth showed a significant difference at each time point while the plaque was not significant between the groups. The overall technical, biological and prosthetic complication rates were 5.04%, 3.36%, and 16.00%, respectively. Conclusions The MBL change was similar in the groups. The slight differences in the soft tissue complications between the groups are likely not of clinical relevance. An IL connection is considered to be a valid alternative to an AL set-up in ICC implants.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 93
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implant vs abutment level connection in implant supported screw-retained fixed partial dentures with cobalt-chrome framework: 1-year interim results of a randomized clinical study
    Toia, Marco
    Stocchero, Michele
    Becktor, Jonas P.
    Chrcanovic, Bruno
    Wennerberg, Ann
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (02) : 238 - 246
  • [2] Clinical outcomes of implant- versus abutment-level connection in screw-retained fixed dental prostheses: A 5-year randomized controlled trial
    Toia, Marco
    Parpaiola, Andrea
    Stevanello, Nicole
    Tattan, Mustafa
    Saleh, Muhammad H. A.
    Ravida, Andrea
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (02) : 230 - 241
  • [3] In vitro investigation of marginal accuracy of implant-supported screw-retained partial dentures
    Koke, U
    Wolf, A
    Lenz, P
    Gilde, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 31 (05) : 477 - 482
  • [4] Cemented vs screw-retained zirconia-based single implant reconstructions: A 3-year prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
    Kraus, Riccardo D.
    Epprecht, Alyssa
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Sailer, Irena
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (04) : 578 - 585
  • [5] Marginal changes at bone-level implants supporting fixed screw-retained partial implant prostheses with or without intermediate standardised abutments: 1-year results of a randomised controlled clinical trial
    Maceiras, Lucia
    Linares, Antonio
    Novoa, Lourdes
    Batalla, Pilar
    Mareque, Santiago
    Perez, Javier
    Blanco, Juan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (03) : 263 - 274
  • [6] Optimizing the esthetic outcome by using screw-retained implant abutment crowns: A 3-year clinical follow-up
    Cicero, Emanuele
    El Rafie, Khaled
    De Souza, Andre
    Kawabe, Yasuhiko
    Kang, Kiho
    Att, Wael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (05): : 608 - 615
  • [7] Accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillary full-arch screw-retained prosthesis: A crossover randomized trial
    Jasim, Ammar Ghanim
    Abo Elezz, Mona Galal
    Altonbary, Gilan Y.
    Elsyad, Moustafa Abdou
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (04) : 714 - 723
  • [8] Immediate Postextraction Screw-Retained Partial and Full-Arch Rehabilitation: A 3-Year Follow-up Retrospective Clinical Study
    Villa, Roberto
    Villa, Gabriele
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 38 (05) : 627 - 636
  • [9] Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Single Crowns on Customized Zirconia Abutments: 3-Year Results
    Heierle, Linda
    Wolleb, Karin
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    Wiedemeier, Daniel B.
    Sailer, Irena
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 32 (02) : 174 - 176
  • [10] A Protocol for Screw-Retrievable, Cement-Retained, Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures
    AlHelal, Abdulaziz
    Kattadiyil, Mathew T.
    AlBader, Bader
    Clark, Jefferson L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2017, 30 (06) : 577 - 580