Evaluating the Performance of Small Wastewater Treatment Plants

被引:4
|
作者
Engstler, Eva [1 ]
Kerschbaumer, David J. [1 ]
Langergraber, Guenter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna BOKU, Inst Sanit Engn & Water Pollut Control, Dept Water Atmosphere & Environm, Vienna, Austria
关键词
external monitoring; technologies; treatment performance; vertical flow wetlands; long-term; on-site; household;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2022.948366
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An evaluation of the treatment performance of small wastewater treatment plants with the capacity of <= 50 PE (population equivalent) was carried out using data collected in external monitoring reports, taking Upper Austria as an example. External monitoring data for 2009-2018 were available for this analysis. About 2 ' 500 small WWTPs are in operation in Upper Austria. The main technologies implemented include about 870 Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) plants, 630 conventional activated sludge (CAS) plants and 535 vertical flow (VF) wetlands. The data set for the present evaluation comprises a total of approx. 14 ' 000 external monitoring reports from approx. 2 ' 000 small WWTPs. This paper presents the results of this evaluation. The evaluation showed that all technologies meet the legal requirements regarding BOD5, COD and NH4-N effluent concentrations. However, for small WWTPs with a polishing stage consisting of a VF wetland, the median values of the effluent concentrations and the limit value exceedances are significantly lower. There is no evidence of a significant deterioration in treatment performance with the age of the plant for any technology. However, for all technical WWTPs such as SBR and CAS plants, a greater fluctuation of the measured values (i.e. the median values of the effluent concentrations) can be observed when the plant is longer in operation. Compared to technical WWTPs, this fluctuation is significantly smaller in VF wetlands.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental performance of wastewater treatment plants for small populations
    Gallego, Alejandro
    Hospido, Almudena
    Moreira, Maria Teresa
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2008, 52 (06) : 931 - 940
  • [3] Biotechnological wastewater treatment in small-scale wastewater treatment plants
    Mazeikiene, Ausra
    Grubliauskas, Raimondas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279
  • [4] Performance improvements at wastewater treatment plants
    Anon
    [J]. National Engineer, 2002, 106 (05): : 31 - 32
  • [5] Performance indicators for wastewater treatment plants
    Balmer, P.
    Hellstrom, D.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 65 (07) : 1304 - 1310
  • [6] An evaluation of performance and process stability of different processes for small wastewater treatment plants
    Odegaard, H
    Skrovseth, AF
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 35 (06) : 119 - 127
  • [7] Operational and control practices to improve the performance of small wastewater treatment plants in Catalonia
    Camos, C
    Martorell, S
    Rey, A
    Güell, D
    Robusté, J
    Colprim, J
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [8] A novel method for rapid assessment of the performance and complexity of small wastewater treatment plants
    Korgmaa, Vallo
    Tenno, Taavo
    Kiviruut, Aimar
    Kriipsalu, Mait
    Gross, Mihkel
    Tamm, Priit
    Karabelnik, Kristjan
    Terase, Harri
    Vark, Vahur
    Lepik, Natalja
    Pachel, Karin
    Iital, Arvo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ESTONIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2019, 68 (01) : 32 - 42
  • [9] Performance of very small wastewater treatment plants with pronounced load variations.
    Kegebein, J.
    Hoffmann, E.
    Hahn, H. H.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 55 (07) : 31 - 38
  • [10] Tertiary filtration in small wastewater treatment plants
    Naddeo, V.
    Belgiorno, V.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 55 (07) : 219 - 225