Integrating habitat availability into restoration efforts for biodiversity conservation: Evaluating effectiveness and setting priorities

被引:8
|
作者
Wang, Lin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ren, Guopeng [5 ]
Hua, Fangyuan [6 ]
Young, Stephen S. [7 ]
Wang, Wei [8 ]
Yang, Chunyan [3 ]
Zhu, Jianguo [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Southeast Asia Biodivers Res Inst, Mengla 666303, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Xishuangbanna Trop Bot Garden, Ctr Integrat Conservat, Mengla 666303, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Kunming Inst Zool, State Key Lab Genet Resources & Evolut, 32 Jiaochang Donglu, Kunming 650223, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Core Bot Gardens, Ctr Conservat Biol, Mengla 666303, Peoples R China
[5] Dali Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Thre, Prov Innovat Team Biodivers Conservat & Util Thre, Inst Eastern Himalaya Biodivers Res, Dali 671003, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Inst Ecol, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[7] Salem State Univ, Dept Geog, Salem, MA 01970 USA
[8] Chinese Res Acad Environm Sci CRAES, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Connectivity; Dispersal distance; Eastern Himalaya; Grain-for-Green Program; Forest restoration; Planning unit; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY; GLOBAL METAANALYSIS; STEPPING STONES; PROTECTED AREAS; PATCHES; OPPORTUNITIES; ACCURACY; DRIVERS; FORESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109127
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Numerous restoration programs have been launched worldwide in recent years, but the effectiveness of such programs for biodiversity conservation remains unclear. Additionally, priority areas of restoration need to be identified in a region where resources are limited. Habitat availability combines habitat amounts with interpatch connectivity, governing whether a landscape can shelter biological populations in the long term. Consequently, restoration efforts should focus on enhancing habitat availability to promote biological flows. In this study, we proposed a multi-scale approach to evaluate the effectiveness of restoration program and to set priority areas for forest restoration. The evaluations of effectiveness highlighted the contributions of forest cover change to habitat availability. The restoration priorities of landscapes were ranked by three indicators which are also tightly associated with habitat availability: relative urgency of intervention, efficiency of restoration, and connectivity importance for broader-scale biotic flows. We applied the approach in the Eastern Himalaya region of China, a global biodiversity conservation hotspot. Forest cover has been increasing by 3.4% in this region since 2000 due to the implementation of the Grain-for-Green Program, but not all the new forest areas were available as species habitat and/or stepping stones. By the method we developed, 14% of the areas are ranked as the high restoration priorities aiming to enhance available habitat for multiple species with different dispersal abilities. Our approach can significantly improve the outcome of a restoration program. It is flexible and can aid policy makers in optimizing restoration efforts given the biodiversity conservation goals and available resources.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BIODIVERSITY, BIOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTY, AND SETTING CONSERVATION PRIORITIES
    SHRADERFRECHETTE, KS
    MCCOY, ED
    [J]. BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 1994, 9 (02) : 167 - 195
  • [2] Integrating habitat risk and landscape resilience in forest protection and restoration planning for biodiversity conservation
    Tan, Chuandong
    Xu, Bo
    Hong, Ge
    Wu, Xuefei
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 248
  • [3] Integrating habitat status, human population pressure, and protection status into biodiversity conservation priority setting
    Shi, H
    Singh, A
    Kant, S
    Zhu, ZL
    Waller, E
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) : 1273 - 1285
  • [4] Biodiversity hotspots in the Mediterranean basin:: Setting global conservation priorities
    Médail, F
    Quézel, P
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (06) : 1510 - 1513
  • [5] Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of biodiversity conservation spending
    Laycock, Helen F.
    Moran, Dominic
    Smart, James C. R.
    Raffaelli, David G.
    White, Piran C. L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (10) : 1789 - 1796
  • [6] Research priorities for conservation of metallophyte biodiversity and their potential for restoration and site remediation
    Whiting, SN
    Reeves, RD
    Richards, D
    Johnson, MS
    Cooke, JA
    Malaisse, F
    Paton, A
    Smith, JAC
    Angle, JS
    Chaney, RL
    Ginocchio, R
    Jaffré, T
    Johns, R
    McIntyre, T
    Purvis, OW
    Salt, DE
    Schat, H
    Zhao, FJ
    Baker, AJM
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2004, 12 (01) : 106 - 116
  • [7] Ecological economics, uncertainty and implications for policy setting priorities for biodiversity conservation
    Barbier, EB
    [J]. INVESTING IN BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: THE CAIRNS CONFERENCE, 1997, : 115 - 140
  • [8] A Framework to Optimize Biodiversity Restoration Efforts Based on Habitat Amount and Landscape Connectivity
    Tambosi, Leandro R.
    Martensen, Alexandre C.
    Ribeiro, Milton C.
    Metzger, Jean P.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2014, 22 (02) : 169 - 177
  • [9] Conservation of biodiversity within Canadian agricultural landscapes: Integrating habitat for wildlife
    Mineau, P
    McLaughlin, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 1996, 9 (02): : 93 - 113
  • [10] Mapping the seagrass conservation and restoration priorities: Coupling habitat suitability and anthropogenic pressures
    Hu, Wenjia
    Zhang, Dian
    Chen, Bin
    Liu, Xinming
    Ye, Xiaomin
    Jiang, Qutu
    Zheng, Xinqing
    Du, Jianguo
    Chen, Shiquan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129