Dicentric assay: Inter-laboratory comparison in Indian laboratories for routine and triage applications

被引:18
|
作者
Bakkiam, D. [1 ]
Bhavani, M. [2 ]
Kumar, A. Arul Anantha [1 ]
Sonwani, Swetha [1 ]
Venkatachalam, P. [2 ]
Sivasubramanian, K. [1 ]
Venkatraman, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indira Gandhi Ctr Atom Res, Radiol Safety Div, Kalpakkam 603102, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Sri Ramachandra Univ, Madras 600116, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Biodosimetry; Dicentric assay; Inter-laboratory comparison; Triage dose estimation; BIOLOGICAL DOSIMETRY; CHROMOSOME ASSAY; CYTOGENETIC DOSIMETRY; RADIATION; BIODOSIMETRY; CASUALTIES; OVEREXPOSURE; ACCIDENTS; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.02.015
中图分类号
O61 [无机化学];
学科分类号
070301 ; 081704 ;
摘要
An Inter-Laboratory Comparison (ILC) study on Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA) was carried out between two Indian biodosimetry labs. Human peripheral blood samples exposed to 10 different doses of X-rays up to 5 Gy were shared between the labs to generate calibration data. Validation of calibration curves was done by dose estimation of coded samples exposed to X- or gamma radiation. Reliability of the DCA data for triage application was evaluated by scoring 20, 50 and 100 metaphases in the dose range of 0.5-3.0 Gy. No significant difference was observed between labs regarding the established calibration data as well as the DCA triage dose assessments. Scoring of 20 metaphases (MP) was adequate to detect radiation exposure of > 2 Gy whereas 50 MP were sufficient to determine exposures of 0.5 Gy. Both labs performed the DCA in a reliable manner and made the first step in setting up a biodosimetry network in India. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd, All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 85
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Dicentric Chromosome Assay
    Endesfelder, D.
    Oestreicher, U.
    Bucher, M.
    Beinke, C.
    Siebenwirth, C.
    Ainsbury, E.
    Moquet, J.
    Gruel, G.
    Gregoire, E.
    Martinez, J. S.
    Vral, A.
    Baeyens, A.
    Valente, M.
    Montoro, A.
    Terzoudi, G.
    Triantopoulou, S.
    Pantelias, A.
    Gil, O. Monteiro
    Prieto, M. J.
    Domene, M. M.
    Zafiropoulos, D.
    Barquinero, J. F.
    Pujol-Canadell, M.
    Lumniczky, K.
    Hargitai, R.
    Kis, E.
    Testa, A.
    Patrono, C.
    Sommer, S.
    Hristova, R.
    Kostova, N.
    Atanasova, M.
    Sevriukova, O.
    Dominguez, I.
    Pastor, N.
    Guclu, I.
    Pajic, J.
    Sabatier, L.
    Brochard, P.
    Tichy, A.
    Milanova, M.
    Finot, F.
    Petrenci, C. Cuceu
    Wilkins, R. C.
    Beaton-Green, L. A.
    Seong, K. M.
    Lee, Y.
    Lee, Y. H.
    Balajee, A. S.
    Maznyk, N.
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2023, 199 (06) : 556 - 570
  • [2] Inter-laboratory comparison to validate the dicentric assay as a cytogenetic triage tool for medical management of radiation accidents
    Beinke, Christina
    Oestreicher, Ursula
    Riecke, Armin
    Kulka, Ulrike
    Meineke, Viktor
    Romm, Horst
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2011, 46 (09) : 929 - 935
  • [3] Assessment methods for inter-laboratory comparisons of the dicentric assay
    Gonzalez Mesa, Jorge Ernesto
    Holladay, Bret
    Higueras, Manuel
    Di Giorgio, Marina
    Barquinero, Joan Francesc
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2023, 99 (03) : 431 - 438
  • [4] Inter-laboratory comparison measurements of radiochemical laboratories in Slovakia
    Meresova, J.
    Belanova, A.
    Vrskova, M.
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2010, 68 (7-8) : 1282 - 1285
  • [5] Reliability of mutagen sensitivity assay: an inter-laboratory comparison
    Erdei, Esther
    Lee, Sang-Joon
    Wei, Qingyi
    Wang, Li-E.
    Song, Yan-S.
    Bovbjerg, Dana
    Berwick, Marianne
    MUTAGENESIS, 2006, 21 (04) : 261 - 264
  • [6] RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Gene Expression Assay
    Abend, M.
    Amundson, S. A.
    Badie, C.
    Brzoska, K.
    Kriehuber, R.
    Lacombe, J.
    Lopez-Riego, M.
    Lumniczky, K.
    Endesfelder, D.
    O'Brien, G.
    Doucha-Senf, S.
    Ghandhi, S. A.
    Hargitai, R.
    Kis, E.
    Lundholm, L.
    Oskamp, D.
    Ostheim, P.
    Schuele, S.
    Schwanke, D.
    Shuryak, I.
    Siebenwith, C.
    Unverricht-Yeboah, M.
    Wojcik, A.
    Yang, J.
    Zenhausern, F.
    Port, M.
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2023, 199 (06) : 598 - 615
  • [7] Inter-laboratory comparison of the assessment approaches for the zebrafish embryotoxicity assay
    Wilhelmi, P.
    Teixido, E.
    Birk, B.
    Landsiedel, R.
    van Ravenzwaay, B.
    Funkt-Weyer, D.
    Flick, B.
    NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 395 (SUPPL 1) : S30 - S30
  • [8] PROFICIENCY TESTING FOR AIR POLLUTION TEST LABORATORIES BY INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON SCHEMES
    Debiasi, R.
    Nicolau, M.
    Mitran, E.
    Nicolescu, I.
    Danciulescu, V.
    Stanescu, G. B.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2006, 7 (01): : 204 - 211
  • [9] Inter-laboratory validation of the GreenScreen Assay
    Weale, PA
    Collins, PM
    Barker, MG
    Cahill, P
    Walmsley, RM
    TOXICOLOGY, 2003, 192 (01) : 89 - 90
  • [10] RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: Inter-Assay Comparison of Eight Dosimetry Assays
    Port, M.
    Barquinero, J-F.
    Endesfelder, D.
    Moquet, J.
    Oestreicher, U.
    Terzoudi, G.
    Trompier, F.
    Vral, A.
    Abe, Y.
    Ainsbury, L.
    Alkebsi, L.
    Amundson, S. A.
    Badie, C.
    Baeyens, A.
    Balajee, A. S.
    Balazs, K.
    Barnard, S.
    Bassinet, C.
    Beaton-Green, L. A.
    Beinke, C.
    Bobyk, L.
    Brochard, P.
    Brzoska, K.
    Bucher, M.
    Ciesielski, B.
    Cuceu, C.
    Discher, M.
    Oca, M. C. D.
    Dominguez, I.
    Doucha-Senf, S.
    Dumitrescu, A.
    Duy, P. N.
    Finot, F.
    Garty, G.
    Ghandhi, S. A.
    Gregoire, E.
    Goh, V. S. T.
    Guclu, I.
    Hadjiiska, L.
    Hargitai, R.
    Hristova, R.
    Ishii, K.
    Kis, E.
    Juniewicz, M.
    Kriehuber, R.
    Lacombe, J.
    Lee, Y.
    Riego, M. Lopez
    Lumniczky, K.
    Mai, T. T.
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2023, 199 (06) : 535 - 555