Conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews in gynaecological cancer: A systematic analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Yin, Shande [1 ]
Chuai, Yunhai [1 ]
Wang, Aiming [1 ]
Zhang, Lanmei [1 ]
机构
[1] Navy Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Systematic review; Gynaecological cancer; Randomized clinical trial; Nonrandomised study; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0300060515574922
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the conclusiveness of Cochrane reviews in the field of gynaecological cancer. Methods The Cochrane Library was searched for reviews regarding gynaecological cancer published between 1 January 2000 and 1 November 2014. Data were extracted from each paper and the conclusiveness of each review was assessed. Results The study included 66 reviews, 41 (62.1%) of which were conclusive. Of these, 58 included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 37 (63.8%) of which were conclusive. Conclusive reviews of RCTs included significantly more patients than inconclusive reviews, but there was no difference in the number of included studies. Of the eight reviews of nonrandomized studies, four (50.0%) were conclusive. The majority of reviews recognized the need for additional studies. Conclusions In the field of gynaecological cancer, reviews are more likely to be conclusive when they include RCTs, as well as large numbers of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 315
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Nutrition: a systematic analysis
    Cohen, S.
    Mandel, D.
    Mimouni, F. B.
    Marom, R.
    Lubetzky, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2014, 68 (02) : 143 - 145
  • [2] Conclusiveness of the cochrane neonatal reviews: A systematic analysis
    Mandel, Dror
    Littner, Yoav
    Mimouni, Francis B.
    Lubetzky, Ronit
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2006, 95 (10) : 1209 - 1212
  • [3] Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Nutrition: a systematic analysis
    S Cohen
    D Mandel
    F B Mimouni
    R Marom
    R Lubetzky
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2014, 68 : 143 - 145
  • [4] Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews on Nursing Interventions for Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Analysis
    Kako, Jun
    Kobayashi, Masamitsu
    Kajiwara, Kohei
    Ito, Yoshiyasu
    Tsubaki, Michihiro
    Kakeda, Takahiro
    [J]. JMA JOURNAL, 2024, 7 (02): : 178 - 184
  • [5] Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Palliative and Supportive Care for Cancer: A Systematic Analysis
    Zhang, Xia
    Wu, Zhiyong
    Zhao, Haiqing
    Li, Chenxi
    Wu, Jianyu
    Dai, Guanghai
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 34 (01): : 53 - 56
  • [6] Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Pediatric-Gastroenterology: a systematic analysis
    Cohen, Shlomi
    Lubetzky, Ronit
    Mimouni, Francis B.
    Marom, Ronella
    Mandel, Dror
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 25 (02) : 252 - 254
  • [7] Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review
    Momosaki, Ryo
    Tsuboi, Marika
    Yasufuku, Yuichi
    Furudate, Ken
    Kamo, Tomohiko
    Uda, Kazuaki
    Tanaka, Yuu
    Abo, Masahiro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2019, 42 (02) : 97 - 105
  • [8] Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews Ophthalmology
    Mimouni M.
    Mimouni F.
    Segev F.
    [J]. BMC Research Notes, 8 (1)
  • [9] Cochrane systematic reviews of treatments for lung cancer
    Fong, KM
    Yang, IA
    Zimmerman, PV
    Bowman, RV
    [J]. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2005, 99 (09) : 1071 - 1078
  • [10] Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Family Nursing: A Meta-research Study
    Kajiwara, Kohei
    Ito, Yoshiyasu
    Tsubaki, Michihiro
    Kobayashi, Masamitsu
    Kakeda, Takahiro
    Kako, Jun
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 36 (01) : 111 - 114