Dexmedetomidine in combination with ketamine for pediatric procedural sedation or premedication: A meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Li, Hong-pei [1 ]
Liu, Kun-peng [1 ]
Yao, Lan [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Int Hosp, 1 Shengmingyuan Rd,Zhongguancun Life Sci Pk, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Ketamine; Sedation; Pediatrics; Hemodynamics; Adverse events; PERIOPERATIVE DEXMEDETOMIDINE; INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE; SEVERE BRADYCARDIA; PROPOFOL-KETAMINE; ANESTHESIA; EFFICACY; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.073
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of combinational use of dexmedetomidine and ketamine (DEX-KET) for pediatric procedural sedation or premedication. Methods: Relevant studies were identified after a literature search in electronic databases and study selection was based on precise eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses of mean differences were performed to examine differences in sedation onset and recovery times between DEX-KET and comparators. Changes from baseline in heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were pooled. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed to estimate incidence of adverse events. Results: 15 studies (1087 patients) were included. Onset of sedation was significantly shorter in DEX-KET than in DEX group. HR declined in DEX-KET group from start (-3.5 beats per minute (BPM) [95% CI: -5.1, -1.9]) through midpoint (-7.2 BPM [95% CI: -12.1, -2.3]) and at end of sedation (-8.7 BPM [95% CI: -13.1, -4.4]). Decrease in HR after DEX administration at start was -11.6 BPM [95% CI: -16.0, -7.1] and remained consistent afterward. There was no change in MAP during DEX-KET sedation. However, after DEX administration, MAP decreased by -6.9 [95% CI: -10.4, -3.3] at start, -7.8 [95% CI: -11.4, -4.2] at middle, and by -6.6 [95% CI: -14.4, 1.1] at end of sedation. Incidence of hypotension was 3% [95% CI: 0, 9] in DEX-KET, 7% [95% CI: 2,14] in DEX, and 0% [95% CI: 0, 2] in KET groups. Incidence of bradycardia was 2% [95% CI: 0, 6] with DEX-KET and 12% [95% CI: 5, 20] with DEX. Incidence of oxygen desaturation was 3% [95% CI: 0, 8] in DEX-KET, 2% [95% CI: 0, 6] in DEX, 12% [95% CI: 5, 20] in KET, and 13% [95% CI: 6, 21] in PROP-KET groups. MIDA-KET sedation had 13% [95% CI: 4, 25] incidence of tachycardia. Conclusions: DEX-KET for pediatric sedation results in better sedation outcomes than DEX or KET by shortening onset of sedation and recovery while maintaining hemodynamic and respiratory stability with low incidence of adverse events. DEX sedation was associated with higher incidence of bradycardia. Higher incidence of oxygen desaturation was observed with KET and PROP-KET whereas MIDA-KET was associated with higher incidence of tachycardia. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 448
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of 17 948 pediatric patients undergoing procedural sedation with a combination of intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine
    Yang, Fei
    Liu, Yang
    Yu, Qing
    Li, Shangyingying
    Zhang, Jin
    Sun, Mang
    Liu, Lu
    Lei, Yao
    Tian, Qing
    Liu, Hui
    Tu, Shengfen
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2019, 29 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [2] Procedural Sedation With Dexmedetomidine in Combination With Ketamine in the Emergency Department
    Gregoire, Charles
    De Kock, Marc
    Henrie, Julie
    Cren, Rosen
    Lavand'homme, Patricia
    Penaloza, Andrea
    Verschuren, Franck
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (02): : 283 - 288
  • [3] Procedural Sedation With Dexmedetomidine in Combination With Ketamine in the Emergency Department
    Gregoire, Charles
    De Kock, Marc
    Henrie, Julie
    Cren, Rosen
    Lavand'homme, Patricia
    Penaloza, Andrea
    Verschuren, Franck
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (01): : 283 - 289
  • [4] DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND KETAMINE FOR PROCEDURAL SEDATION
    Tobias, Joseph D.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (12) : A182 - A182
  • [5] The comparison of ketamine-dexmedetomidine (ketadex) and ketamine-propofol (ketofol) for procedural sedation in pediatric patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gao, Peng-fei
    Li, Shi-yue
    Li, Yue
    Zhao, Le
    Luo, Qiang
    Ji, Yang
    [J]. HELIYON, 2022, 8 (10)
  • [6] Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation/Anesthesia in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hayes, Jason A.
    Aljuhani, Talal
    De Oliveira, Kyle
    Johnston, Bradley C.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 132 (04): : 979 - 992
  • [7] An evaluation of dexmedetomidine in combination with midazolam in pediatric sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nie, Juan
    Li, Chenxi
    Yang, Ge
    Chang, Huihui
    Ding, Guicong
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [8] Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peng, Ke
    Wu, Shao-ru
    Ji, Fu-hai
    Li, Jian
    [J]. CLINICS, 2014, 69 (11) : 777 - 786
  • [9] The role of parents in reporting sedation outcomes in our analysis of 17 948 pediatric patients undergoing procedural sedation with a combination of intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine
    Yang, Fei
    Liu, Yang
    Yu, Qing
    Li, Shangyingying
    Zhang, Jin
    Sun, Mang
    Liu, Lu
    Lei, Yao
    Tian, Qing
    Liu, Hui
    Tu, Shengfen
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2019, 29 (12) : 1208 - 1208
  • [10] Ketamine versus ketamine pluses atropine for pediatric sedation: A meta-analysis
    Shi, Jiaxiao
    Li, Ang
    Wei, Zhijian
    Liu, Yang
    Xing, Cong
    Shi, Hongyu
    Ding, Han
    Pan, Dayu
    Ning, Guangzhi
    Feng, Shiqing
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (07): : 1280 - 1286