The Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool for cancer patients: A validation study using a Delphi process and patient think-aloud interviews

被引:80
|
作者
Hagen, Neil A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stiles, Carla [1 ,2 ]
Nekolaichuk, Cheryl [4 ,5 ]
Biondo, Patricia [1 ,2 ]
Carlson, Linda E. [1 ,2 ]
Fisher, Kim [2 ]
Fainsinger, Robin [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Calgary, AB 133129, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Div Palliat Med, Calgary, AB 133129, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Hlth Reg Palliat & Hospice Care Serv, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Cross Canc Inst, Alberta Canc Board, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Alberta, Div Palliat Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
cancer pain; breakthrough pain; assessment; instrument development;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.03.016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Breakthrough pain is a prevalent cancer pain syndrome, and research is needed to identify more effective interventions to manage it. A validated tool to assess breakthrough pain in a standard and reliable manner is urgently needed to support the conduct of clinical trials in breakthrough pain. To address this need, we developed a breakthrough pain assessment tool for research purposes. The current study was undertaken to gather validity evidence for this breakthrough pain assessment tool, using a Delphi process involving an expert panel review, followed by a think-aloud process involving patients with cancer-related breakthrough pain. Two expert panels were formed: a national panel (within Canada; n = 16) and an international panel (including experts from North America, UK, Europe, the Middle East, Australia, and New Zealand; n = 22). Each panel participated in one anonymous surrey round. Response rates were 56% (national panel) and 73% (international panel). The Delphi process revealed substantial consensus on the content of the tool, which increased between rounds of review. The overall level of agreement with the tool, averaged over the four evaluated aspects of all items, was 80% among national panelists and 88% among international panelists. Nine patients completed the think-aloud study. They were able to understand and complete the tool and provided specific direction on its improvement. The validity evidence gathered in this study suggests the Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool is conceptually grounded and is understandable by patients and clinicians. Further validation of this tool as an assessment measure within clinical trials research is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 152
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool for cancer patients: A validation study
    Biondo, Patricia
    Hagen, Neil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2007, 23 (03) : 199 - 200
  • [2] Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool: A validation multicentre study in cancer patients with breakthrough pain
    Sperlinga, R.
    Campagna, S.
    Berruti, A.
    Laciura, P.
    Ginosa, I.
    Paoletti, S.
    Giuliano, P. L.
    Tucci, M.
    Rosato, R.
    Scagliotti, G. V.
    Saini, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 19 (07) : 881 - 888
  • [3] Developing an Engineering Design Process Assessment Using Think-Aloud Interviews
    Alemdar, Meltem
    Lingle, Jeremy A.
    Wind, Stefanie A.
    Moore, Roxanne A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2017, 33 (01) : 441 - 452
  • [4] Using Think-aloud Interviews to Examine a Clinically Oriented Performance Assessment Rubric
    Roberts, Mary Roduta
    Gotch, Chad M.
    Cook, Megan
    Werther, Karin
    Chao, Iris C. I.
    [J]. MEASUREMENT-INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 20 (03) : 139 - 150
  • [5] An education resource for human papillomavirus oropharyngeal cancer patients: think-aloud interviews
    Ashleigh R. Sharman
    Eliza M. Ferguson
    Haryana M. Dhillon
    Paula Macleod
    Julie McCrossin
    Puma Sundaresan
    Jonathan R. Clark
    Megan A. Smith
    Rachael H. Dodd
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023, 31
  • [6] An education resource for human papillomavirus oropharyngeal cancer patients: think-aloud interviews
    Sharman, Ashleigh R. R.
    Ferguson, Eliza M. M.
    Dhillon, Haryana M. M.
    Macleod, Paula
    McCrossin, Julie
    Sundaresan, Puma
    Clark, Jonathan R. R.
    Smith, Megan A. A.
    Dodd, Rachael H. H.
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2023, 31 (03)
  • [7] Usability testing of an electronic pain monitoring system for palliative cancer patients: A think-aloud study
    Taylor, Sally
    Allsop, Matthew J.
    Bennett, Michael I.
    Bewick, Bridgette M.
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (03) : 1133 - 1147
  • [8] Using think-aloud interviews to characterize model-based reasoning in electronics for a laboratory course assessment
    Rios, Laura
    Pollard, Benjamin
    Dounas-Frazer, Dimitri R.
    Lewandowski, H. J.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (01):
  • [9] Clinical reasoning in nursing, a think-aloud study using virtual patients - A base for an innovative assessment
    Forsberg, Elenita
    Ziegert, Kristina
    Hult, Hakan
    Fors, Uno
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2014, 34 (04) : 538 - 542
  • [10] Validation of the Dutch Version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool in Patients With Cancer
    Oldenmenger, Wendy H.
    Lucas, Anne
    van der Werff, Gertruud F. H.
    Webber, Katherine
    Visser, Dick
    van der Velden, Annette W. G.
    van der Rijt, Carin C. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2020, 59 (03) : 709 - +