The effect of discharge destination and primary insurance provider on hospital discharge delays among patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicenter study of 1,543 patients

被引:20
|
作者
Sorensen, Melissa [1 ]
Sercy, Erica [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Salottolo, Kristin [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Waxman, Michael [6 ]
West, Thomas A. [7 ]
Tanner, Allen, II [8 ]
Bar-Or, David [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Med Ctr, Trauma Serv Dept, Englewood, CO 80110 USA
[2] Swedish Med Ctr, Trauma Res Dept, Englewood, CO 80110 USA
[3] Med City Plano, Trauma Res Dept, Plano, TX 75075 USA
[4] Med Res Ctr, Trauma Res Dept, Kansas City, MO USA
[5] Penrose Community Hosp, Trauma Res Dept, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[6] Med Res Ctr, Med Surg Intens Care Unit, Kansas City, MO USA
[7] Med City Plano, Trauma Serv Dept, Plano, TX USA
[8] Penrose Community Hosp, Trauma Serv Dept, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[9] Injury Outcomes Network Res Grp, 501 E Hampden Ave, Englewood, CO 80113 USA
关键词
Patient discharge; Traumatic brain injury; Insurance; LENGTH-OF-STAY; MORTALITY; INFECTIONS; SEVERITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s13037-019-0227-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Hospital length of stay (HLOS) is a commonly used measure of hospital quality and is influenced by clinical and non-clinical factors. To reduce HLOS, it is key to identify factors placing patients at increased risk of lengthy HLOS and discharge delays. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients age >= 18 admitted to four level 1 trauma centers between 1/1/2015 and 3/31/2018 with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary outcome was discharge delay, defined as discharge >= 24 h after case management notes indicated the patient was ready for discharge. The independent variables of interest were primary insurance provider and discharge destination. Chi-square, Fisher exact, and unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between discharge delay and the two primary independent variables, as well as other patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Complications developing during the delay period were also examined. Results A total of 1543 patients with TBI were included. The median age was 61 years, and the median HLOS was 5 days. Approximately half of patients were discharged home (54%). The most common insurance providers were Medicare (35%) and commercial/private (35%). Two-hundred ten (14%) patients experienced a discharge delay. The median delay period was 3 days, and the most common reasons for delay were insurance authorization (52%) and lack of accepting bed (41%). Compared to being discharged home, patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 10.35) or intermediate care facility (AOR = 10.64) had the highest odds of discharge delay. Compared to Medicare patients, uninsured/self-pay patients (AOR = 2.98) and those with Medicaid (AOR = 2.83) or commercial/private insurance (AOR = 2.22) had higher odds of delay. Thirty-two patients (15% of those delayed) experienced at least one complication during the delay, some of which were clinically severe. Conclusions A substantial portion of TBI patients in this study experienced discharge delays, and discharge destination and primary insurance provider were significant drivers of these delays. Evaluation of a facility's quality of care should consider the specific causes of these delays.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] The effect of discharge destination and primary insurance provider on hospital discharge delays among patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicenter study of 1,543 patients
    Melissa Sorensen
    Erica Sercy
    Kristin Salottolo
    Michael Waxman
    Thomas A. West
    Allen Tanner
    David Bar-Or
    [J]. Patient Safety in Surgery, 14
  • [2] Cognitive status at discharge from the hospital determines discharge destination in traumatic brain injury patients
    Van Baalen, B.
    Odding, E.
    Stam, H. J.
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2008, 22 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [3] Ethnic differences in discharge destination among older patients with traumatic brain injury
    Chang, Pei-Fen J.
    Ostir, Glenn V.
    Kuo, Yong-Fang
    Granger, Carl V.
    Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (02): : 231 - 236
  • [4] Functional profile of patients with traumatic brain injury at hospital discharge
    Magalhaes, Arieli Cristina
    Parisi, Aline Guizzi
    Nascimento, Bruna
    Tonella, Rodrigo Marques
    Camargo, Tais Mendes
    [J]. MUNDO DA SAUDE, 2022, 46 : 339 - 347
  • [5] Race and Insurance Disparities in Discharge to Rehabilitation for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
    Asemota, Anthony O.
    George, Benjamin P.
    Cumpsty-Fowler, Carolyn J.
    Haider, Adil H.
    Schneider, Eric B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2013, 30 (24) : 2057 - 2065
  • [6] Predictors of discharge destination from acute care in patients with traumatic brain injury
    Zarshenas, Sareh
    Tam, Laetitia
    Colantonio, Angela
    Alavinia, Seyed Mohammad
    Cullen, Nora
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (08):
  • [7] Selection of discharge destination for patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury
    Oyesanya, Tolu O.
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2020, 34 (09) : 1222 - 1228
  • [8] Predictors of Discharge Destination From Acute Care in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
    Zarshenas, Sareh
    Colantonio, Angela
    Alavinia, Seyed Mohammad
    Jaglal, Susan
    Tam, Laetitia
    Cullen, Nora
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2019, 34 (01) : 52 - 64
  • [9] Readiness for hospital discharge perceived by caregivers of patients with traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional study
    Ganefianty, Amelia
    Songwathana, Praneed
    Damkliang, Jintana
    [J]. BELITUNG NURSING JOURNAL, 2024, 10 (02) : 209 - 214
  • [10] Care patterns and predictors of community residence among older patients after hospital discharge for traumatic brain injury
    Pappadis, Monique R.
    Malagaris, Ioannis
    Kuo, Yong-Fang
    Leland, Natalie
    Freburger, Janet
    Goodwin, James S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2023, 71 (06) : 1806 - 1818