Logical composition of qualitative shapes applied to solve spatial reasoning tests

被引:8
|
作者
Pich, Albert [1 ,2 ]
Falomir, Zoe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bremen, BSCC, Bremen, Germany
[2] Univ Jaume 1, Castellon de La Plana, Spain
关键词
Qualitative spatial reasoning; Qualitative shape descriptor; Shape composition; Angle composition; Length composition; Logic; Tangram; Puzzle; Spatial cognition; Spatial reasoning tests; Prolog; Logic programming; JIGSAW PUZZLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.06.002
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A logical approach to compose qualitative shape descriptors (LogC-QSD) is presented in this paper. Each object shape is described qualitatively by its edges, angles, convexities, and lengths. LogC-QSD describes the shape of composed objects qualitatively adding circuits to describe the connections among the shapes. It also infers new angles and lengths using composition tables. Its main contributions are: (i) describing qualitatively the resulting boundary of connecting N shapes and (ii) its application to solve spatial reasoning tests. LogC-QSD approach has been implemented using Prolog programming language, which is based on Horn clauses and first order logic. The testing framework was SWI-Prolog on the LogC-QSD dataset. The obtained results show that the LogC-QSD approach was able to correctly answer all the questions in the LogC-QSD dataset, which involved compositions up to five shapes. The correct answer for 60% of the questions was obtained in an average time of 2.45.10(-4) s by comparing the concavities and right angles of the final QSD composed shape with the possible answers. The rest of the questions required a matching algorithm and they were solved by LogC-QSD in an average time of 19.50.10(-4) s. Analysis of the execution times obtained showed that the algorithmic cost of LogC-QSD is lower than O(n(2)) in the worst case. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 102
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Qualitative spatial reasoning in a logical framework
    Raffaetà, A
    Renso, C
    Turini, R
    [J]. AI(ASTERISK)IA 2003: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2829 : 78 - 90
  • [2] Weak composition for qualitative spatial and temporal reasoning
    Renz, J
    Ligozat, G
    [J]. PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CONSTRAINT PROGRAMMING - CP 2005, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3709 : 534 - 548
  • [3] A logical approach to incorporating qualitative spatial reasoning into GIS (extended abstract)
    Bennett, B
    Cohn, AG
    Isli, A
    [J]. SPATIAL INFORMATION THEORY: A THEORETICAL BASIC FOR GIS, 1997, 1329 : 503 - 504
  • [4] A logical approach to qualitative and quantitative reasoning
    Saad, Emad
    [J]. SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4724 : 173 - 186
  • [5] The logical status of applied geographical reasoning
    Simandan, Dragos
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 178 : 9 - 12
  • [6] Qualitative spatial reasoning extracting and reasoning with spatial aggregates
    Bailey-Kellogg, C
    Zhao, F
    [J]. AI MAGAZINE, 2003, 24 (04) : 47 - 60
  • [7] A logical study on qualitative default reasoning with probabilities
    Beierle, C
    Kern-Isberner, G
    [J]. LOGIC FOR PROGRAMMING, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, AND REASONING, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2850 : 376 - 388
  • [8] AUTOMATING REASONING - HOW TO USE A COMPUTER TO HELP SOLVE PROBLEMS REQUIRING LOGICAL REASONING
    WOS, L
    [J]. ABACUS-NEW YORK, 1985, 2 (03): : 6 - 21
  • [9] Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning
    不详
    [J]. QUALITATIVE SPATIAL REASONING WITH TOPOLOGICAL INFORMATION, 2002, 2293 : 31 - 40
  • [10] The challenge of qualitative spatial reasoning
    Cohn, AG
    [J]. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 1995, 27 (03) : 323 - 325