Comparative analyses of rider position according to skill levels during walk and trot in Jeju horse

被引:40
|
作者
Kang, Ok-Deuk [1 ]
Ryu, Youn-Chul [1 ]
Ryew, Che-Cheong [2 ]
Oh, Woon-Yong [3 ]
Lee, Chong-Eon [4 ]
Kang, Min-Soo [1 ]
机构
[1] Cheju Natl Univ, Div Biotechnol, Cheju 690756, South Korea
[2] Cheju Natl Univ, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Cheju 690756, South Korea
[3] Natl Inst Anim Sci, Rural Dev Adm, Suwon 441706, South Korea
[4] Natl Inst Anim Sci, Rural Dev Adm, Subtrop Anim Expt Stn, Cheju 690150, South Korea
关键词
Riding; Rider position; Horse; Joint angle;
D O I
10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rider position at walk and trot as a function of rider skill level by analyzing joint angles. Participants included three advanced riders and six beginners, and training was conducted for one hour, twice a week for 24 weeks. In the walk stage of the beginners' group, the elbows and shoulders sustained postures comparable to those of the advanced riders group: the trunk tilted forwards at first, but later it tilted slightly behind the vertical. The knee, ankle, and left-right angle kept stable postures after 12 weeks of training (p < .05). The front-rear (FR) angle of the beginners group improved during training, but it was still lower than the advanced riders group after 24 weeks of training (p < .05). At trot, while the knee angle measurement of the beginners' group was similar to the advanced riders, the ankle joint sustained a forward point posture. The ankle joint maintained dorsiflexion posture with 83.9 degrees +/- 5.3 in the advanced riders group, while the beginners group had plantar flexion posture with 98.7 degrees +/- 6.0. This study suggested that the correlation between the joint and body segment angles could be an important indicator in the evaluation of rider proficiency. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 963
页数:8
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Kinematic Analysis of the Rider According to Different Skill Levels in Sitting Trot and Canter
    Eckardt, Falko
    Witte, Kerstin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2016, 39 : 51 - 57
  • [2] Influence of velocity on horse and rider movement and resulting saddle forces at walk and trot
    Bogisch, S.
    Peinen, K. Geser-Von
    Wiestner, T.
    Roepstorff, L.
    Weishaupt, M. A.
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (01) : 23 - 32
  • [3] Relationship between pelvic tilt control, horse-rider synchronisation, and rider position in sitting trot
    Walker, V. A.
    Pettit, I
    Tranquille, C. A.
    Spear, J.
    Dyson, S. J.
    Murray, R. C.
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 16 (05) : 423 - 432
  • [4] Effect of the rider position during rising trot on the horse's biomechanics (back and trunk kinematics and pressure under the saddle)
    Martin, P.
    Cheze, L.
    Pourcelot, P.
    Desquilbet, L.
    Duray, L.
    Chateau, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2016, 49 (07) : 1027 - 1033
  • [5] Equestrian Rider's Cardiovascular But Not Metabolic Response During Walk, Trot, And Canter Is Variable
    Keener, Michaela M.
    Fountaine, Charles J.
    Keener, John R., II
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05): : 377 - 378
  • [6] Influence of Functional Rider and Horse Asymmetries on Saddle Force Distribution During Stance and in Sitting Trot
    Gunst, Silja
    Dittmann, Marie T.
    Arpagaus, Samuel
    Roepstorff, Christoffer
    Latif, Selma N.
    Klaassen, Bart
    Pauli, Carole A.
    Bauer, Christoph M.
    Weishaupt, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2019, 78 : 20 - 28
  • [7] Rider and Horse Salivary Cortisol Levels During Competition and Impact on Performance
    Peeters, Marie
    Closson, Coline
    Beckers, Jean-Francois
    Vandenheede, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2013, 33 (03) : 155 - 160
  • [8] Motor ability of forelimb both on- and off-riding during walk and trot cadence of horse
    Hyun, Seung-Hyun
    Ryew, Che-Cheong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXERCISE REHABILITATION, 2016, 12 (01) : 60 - 65