Valuing housework - Nineteenth-century anxieties about the commodification of domestic labor

被引:11
|
作者
Siegel, RB [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Law, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0002764298041010005
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article explores the role that law has played in insulating wives' household labor from market exchange. During the 19th century, the feminist movement challenged giving a husband property rights in his wife's labor and argued that wives were entitled to rights in labor they performed in and out of the household Legislatures and courts ultimately granted wives rights in labor performed for third parties but refused to countenance any arrangement that would give a married woman rights in the labor performed for her husband or family. In particular courts refused (and still refuse to this day) to enforce spousal agreements compensating wives for the performance of household labor. In reforming the law of marriage, legislatures and courts struggled to distinguish between market and family relations. In so doing, they imposed legal boundaries on the labor market and defined the economic structure of family transactions for the industrial era.
引用
收藏
页码:1437 / 1451
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条