Fiscal autonomy and stabilization: an empirical analysis of US state governments

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Sungchan [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Fiscal autonomy; Governmental role; Expenditure volatility; Public administration; Fiscal policy; Stabilization; PANEL-DATA; DECENTRALIZATION; SIZE; GROWTH; LEVIATHAN; BEHAVIOR; TESTS;
D O I
10.1108/JFEP-06-2019-0106
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose Even though fiscal autonomy plays a role as one of the prerequisite conditions for fiscal decentralization, there has been little research into why fiscal autonomy is important or how it works for subnational governments. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of fiscal autonomy by using a panel dataset of US state governments from 2001 to 2013. Design/methodology/approach According to the results of general method of moments, the author find that fiscal autonomy leads to reducing volatility in total expenditures. Findings It indicates that fiscal autonomy is necessary for state governments performing one of the three Musgravian role of government (e.g. stabilization). However, when we look at the more detailed relationship between fiscal autonomy and volatility by applying expenditures from major categories such as capital outlay, general expenditure and public welfare, this study finds no statistically significant results. Interestingly, balanced budget requirement and tax and expenditure limitation indicate different effects on expenditure volatility, even though they belong to the same institutional factors. Originality/value This paper is meaningful because it can support the importance of fiscal autonomy on fiscal performance.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 719
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fiscal Powers to Subnational Governments: Reassessing the Concept of Fiscal Autonomy
    Gomes, Sandra
    [J]. REGIONAL AND FEDERAL STUDIES, 2012, 22 (04): : 387 - 406
  • [2] Managing Fiscal Volatility: An Empirical Analysis of California County Governments' Saving Behavior
    Shon, Jongmin
    Kwak, Sunjoo
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 50 (03): : 328 - 345
  • [3] Output fluctuations and fiscal policy: US state and local governments 1978-1994
    Sorensen, BE
    Wu, L
    Yosha, O
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 45 (07) : 1271 - 1310
  • [4] The fiscal effects of US State budget stabilization funds (BSFs): evidence from a meta-analysis
    Wang, Qiushi
    Peng, Jun
    Guan, Zhen
    Xiao, Yan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 25 (06) : 980 - 1004
  • [5] Fiscal Fatigue, Debt limits and Fiscal Space of Mexican State Governments
    Avila, Ignacio Ruelas
    Izquierdo Reyes, Alain Dimitrius
    [J]. GESTION Y POLITICA PUBLICA, 2021, 30 (02): : 29 - 65
  • [6] How regional inequality affects fiscal decentralisation: accounting for the autonomy of subcentral governments
    Sacchi, Agnese
    Salotti, Simone
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2014, 32 (01): : 144 - 162
  • [7] Pursuing Revenue Autonomy or Playing Politics? Fiscal Behaviour of Local Governments in Taiwan
    Kuo, Nai-Ling
    So, Bennis Wai Yip
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 72 (03) : 330 - 343
  • [8] Review of the challenge of fiscal disparities for state and local governments
    Bahl, RW
    [J]. REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2001, 31 (05) : 631 - 634
  • [9] Fiscal Coordination and Financial Dependence of State Governments in Mexico
    Ibarra-Salazar, Jorge
    Rodriguez-Guajardo, Raymundo
    [J]. PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FINANCE, 2010, 30 (03): : 79 - 97
  • [10] Fiscal Impacts of the Opioid Crisis on State and Local Governments
    Bifulco, Robert
    Shybalkina, Iuliia
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 703 (01): : 324 - 349