Social licence for marine protected areas

被引:12
|
作者
Kelly, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Fleming, Aysha [1 ,3 ]
Mackay, Mary [1 ,4 ]
Garcia, Carolina [5 ]
Pecl, Gretta T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas 7005, Australia
[2] Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[3] CSIRO Land & Water, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[4] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[5] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Inst Agr, Hobart, Tas 7005, Australia
关键词
Marine protected areas; Q-methodology; Social acceptability; Social licence; Stakeholder engagement; IMPROVE CONSERVATION; COASTAL COMMUNITIES; SALMON AQUACULTURE; Q-METHODOLOGY; OPERATE; SCIENCE; MANAGEMENT; VALUES; SUBJECTIVITIES; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103782
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The marine environment is a shared public resource and successful marine conservation depends on stakeholder approval and support. The concept of social licence reflects community expectations and support of the use and management of natural resources, and is being increasingly applied in the marine context. Here, support and opposition to marine protected areas are investigated through the frame of social licence. This study explores the perceptions of key marine stakeholders from Tasmania, Australia to improve understanding on social licence for marine protected areas. A combination of Q-methodology and semi-structured interviews are applied to identify how social licence exists and can potentially be developed in practice. Two social perspectives are identified, 1) I use the ocean: MPAs are not the solution, and 2) No one listens: we need MPAs to protect the ocean, that reveal social licence is not a support/oppose outcome and that more nuanced understanding and dialogue around stakeholder engagement and perceptions of the ocean are required. These study outcomes are developed to provide a modern example of marine resource use debate, and to reveal novel insights that can advise marine managers, decision-makers, and stakeholders dealing with marine conflict and opposition in Australia and elsewhere.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the social acceptability of Marine Protected Areas
    Gall, Sarah C.
    Rodwell, Lynda D.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2016, 65 : 30 - 38
  • [2] Conceptualizing Social Outcomes of Large Marine Protected Areas
    Gruby, Rebecca L.
    Fairbanks, Luke
    Acton, Leslie
    Artis, Evan
    Campbell, Lisa M.
    Gray, Noella J.
    Mitchell, Lillian
    Zigler, Sarah Bess Jones
    Wilson, Katie
    [J]. COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 45 (06) : 416 - 435
  • [3] Social and ecological effectiveness of large marine protected areas
    Ban, Natalie C.
    Davies, Tammy E.
    Aguilera, Stacy E.
    Brooks, Cassandra
    Cox, Michael
    Epstein, Graham
    Evans, Louisa S.
    Maxwell, Sara M.
    Nenadovic, Mateja
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 43 : 82 - 91
  • [4] Marine protected areas
    Chand, Annisa
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2023, 4 (06): : 450 - 450
  • [5] Marine protected areas
    Annisa Chand
    [J]. Nature Food, 2023, 4 : 450 - 450
  • [6] Exploring Social Resilience in Madagascar's Marine Protected Areas
    Cinner, Joshua
    Fuentes, Mariana M. P. B.
    Randriamahazo, Herilala
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2009, 14 (01):
  • [7] Social Dimensions in Designing and Managing Marine Protected Areas in Bangladesh
    Islam, Mohammad Mahmudul
    [J]. HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2021, 49 (02) : 171 - 185
  • [8] Social Value of Marine and Coastal Protected Areas in England and Wales
    Pike, Kate
    Johnson, David
    Fletcher, Steve
    Wright, Paul
    Lee, Barbara
    [J]. COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 38 (04) : 412 - 432
  • [9] Social preferences for large marine protected areas in NW Spain
    Solin, Mario
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2023, 155
  • [10] Evaluating the social and ecological effectiveness of partially protected marine areas
    Turnbull, John W.
    Johnston, Emma L.
    Clark, Graeme F.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 921 - 932