Optimal unambiguous filtering of a quantum state: An instance in mixed state discrimination

被引:25
|
作者
Bergou, JA
Herzog, U
Hillery, M
机构
[1] CUNY Hunter Coll, Dept Phys, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Humboldt Univ, Inst Phys, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 2005年 / 71卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042314
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Deterministic discrimination of nonorthogonal states is forbidden by quantum measurement theory. However, if we do not want to succeed all the time, i.e., allow for inconclusive outcomes to occur, then unambiguous discrimination becomes possible with a certain probability of success. A variant of the problem is set discrimination: the states are grouped in sets and we want to determine to which particular set a given pure input state belongs. We consider here the simplest case, termed quantum state filtering, when the N given nonorthogonal states {\psi(1)>,...,\psi(N)>} are divided into two sets and the first set consists of one state only while the second consists of all of the remaining states. We present the derivation of the optimal measurement strategy, in terms of a generalized measurement (positive-operator-valued measure), to distinguish \psi(1)> from the set {\psi(2)>,...,\psi(N)>} and the corresponding optimal success and failure probabilities. The results, but not the complete derivation, were presented previously [Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 25901 (2003)] as the emphasis there was on appplication of the results to probabilistic quantum algorithms. We also show that the problem is equivalent to the discrimination of a pure state and an arbitrary mixed state.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From unambiguous quantum state discrimination to quantum state filtering
    Bergou, JA
    Herzog, U
    Hillery, M
    FORTSCHRITTE DER PHYSIK-PROGRESS OF PHYSICS, 2003, 51 (2-3): : 74 - 80
  • [2] Optimal unambiguous discrimination of two subspaces as a case in mixed-state discrimination
    Bergou, JA
    Feldman, E
    Hillery, M
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2006, 73 (03):
  • [3] Unambiguous quantum-state filtering
    Takeoka, M
    Ban, M
    Sasaki, M
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2003, 68 (01):
  • [4] Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous state discrimination
    Clarke, RBM
    Chefles, A
    Barnett, SM
    Riis, E
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2001, 63 (04): : 1 - 4
  • [5] Minimax Strategy of Optimal Unambiguous State Discrimination
    Zhang Wen-Hai
    Yu Long-Bao
    Cao Zhuo-Liang
    Ye Liu
    COMMUNICATIONS IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 58 (02) : 209 - 212
  • [6] Unambiguous Discrimination Between Mixed Quantum States Based on Programmable Quantum State Discriminators
    Qiu, Daowen
    Gan, Hongfeng
    Cai, Guangya
    Paulo, Mateus
    INTELLIGENT COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES, ICIC 2018, PT III, 2018, 10956 : 700 - 709
  • [7] Minimax Strategy of Optimal Unambiguous State Discrimination
    张文海
    余宝龙
    曹卓良
    叶柳
    CommunicationsinTheoreticalPhysics, 2012, 58 (08) : 209 - 212
  • [8] Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous state discrimination
    Clarke, Roger B. M.
    Chefles, Anthony
    Barnett, Stephen M.
    Riis, Erling
    Physical Review A. Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 2001, 63 (04): : 403051 - 403054
  • [9] Unambiguous State Discrimination in Quantum Key Distribution
    Howard E. Brandt
    Quantum Information Processing, 2005, 4 : 387 - 398
  • [10] Quantum tomography via unambiguous state discrimination
    Salazar, R.
    Delgado, A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2012, 86 (01):