Diagnostic Value of Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) in Adnexal Masses

被引:4
|
作者
Kumar, Vijay [1 ]
Rajan, Shiv [1 ]
Gupta, Sameer [1 ]
Akhtar, Naseem [1 ]
Sharma, Sonali [2 ]
Sinha, Punnet [1 ]
Misra, Sanjeev [3 ]
Chaturvedi, Arun [1 ]
机构
[1] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Surg Oncol, Oncol Off, 3rd Floor,Shatabdi Bldg Phase 2, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Sri Guru Ram Inst Med Sci & Res, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Amritsar, Punjab, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
来源
关键词
ROMA; HE4; CA; 125; Adnexal mass; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER; EPIDIDYMIS PROTEIN 4; COMBINING HE-4; TUMOR-MARKERS; PELVIC MASS; CA125; WOMEN; ACCURACY; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-019-01295-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Differentiating malignancy from benign diseases is the key to successful management of adnexal masses. Risk of malignancy algorithm (ROMA) has been used for this purpose. We have prospectively studied the diagnostic value of ROMA in patients presented with adnexal masses. Methods We prospective calculated ROMA values prior to surgery for adnexal masses. The risk calculated was then correlated with the histological findings, and results were analyzed according to menopausal status. ROMA cutoff value was determined using ROC curve, and sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated. Statistics were performed on SPSS software (version 20.0). Results There were 94 patients with adnexal masses included in the study, 65 (69.1%) had epithelial ovarian cancer and 29 (30.9%) were diagnosed benign on histopathology. In both pre- and postmenopausal patients, ROMA values were significantly higher in patients with malignancy compared to those with benign disease (p < 0.05). ROMA score was of a significant diagnostic value in both premenopausal (AUC = 0.914, Z = 10.81, p < 0.001) and postmenopausal patients (AUC = 0.975, Z = 21.51, p < 0.001). In premenopausal females, ROMA > 13.3% was able to discriminate malignant from benign patients with 97.06% sensitivity and 85.00% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were 91.7% and 94.4%. Similarly, in postmenopausal females, ROMA value of > 76% achieved 87.10% sensitivity and 100.00% specificity in discriminating malignant from benign patients with 100% positive and 69.2% negative predictive value. The overall accuracy of ROMA in pre- and postmenopausal patients was 87.0% and 85%, respectively. Conclusions ROMA is a useful and accurate test for differentiating epithelial ovarian cancer from benign ovarian masses. Further studies are needed to compare performance of ROMA with the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI), CA 125 and HE4. Such comparative studies will be helpful to the clinician in deciding the best diagnostic tool for women with adnexal masses.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 219
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic Value of Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) in Adnexal Masses
    Vijay Kumar
    Shiv Rajan
    Sameer Gupta
    Naseem Akhtar
    Sonali Sharma
    Punnet Sinha
    Sanjeev Misra
    Arun Chaturvedi
    [J]. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2020, 70 : 214 - 219
  • [2] Comparing the Diagnostic Value of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) and Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) in Women with an Adnexal Mass
    Honarvar, Zahra
    Monshi, Mahdokht
    Robati, Fatemeh Karami
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (04)
  • [3] Comparing the Diagnostic Value of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) and Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) in Women with an Adnexal Mass
    Zahra Honarvar
    Mahdokht Monshi
    Fatemeh Karami Robati
    [J]. Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2021, 19
  • [4] Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses
    Terzic, Milan
    Dotlic, Jelena
    Ladjevic, Ivana Likic
    Atanackovic, Jasmina
    Ladjevic, Nebojsa
    [J]. VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2011, 68 (07) : 589 - 593
  • [5] Subjective assessment by ultrasound is superior to the risk of malignancy index (RMI) or the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses
    Van Gorp, Toon
    Veldman, Joan
    Van Calster, Ben
    Cadron, Isabelle
    Leunen, Karin
    Amant, Frederic
    Timmerman, Dirk
    Vergote, Ignace
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (11) : 1649 - 1656
  • [6] External Validation of Diagnostic Models to Estimate the Risk of Malignancy in Adnexal Masses
    Van Holsbeke, Caroline
    Van Calster, Ben
    Bourne, Tom
    Ajossa, Silvia
    Testa, Antonia C.
    Guerriero, Stefano
    Fruscio, Robert
    Lissoni, Andrea Alberto
    Czekierdowski, Artur
    Savelli, Luca
    Van Huffel, Sabine
    Valentin, Lil
    Timmerman, Dirk
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (03) : 815 - 825
  • [7] Predicting Risk of Malignancy in Adnexal Masses
    McDonald, John M.
    Doran, Stacey
    DeSimone, Christopher P.
    Ueland, Fred R.
    DePriest, Paul D.
    Ware, Rachel A.
    Saunders, Brook A.
    Pavlik, Edward J.
    Goodrich, Scott
    Kryscio, Richard J.
    van Nagell, John R., Jr.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (04): : 687 - 694
  • [8] Risk of malignancy index for adnexal masses
    Akdeniz, N.
    Kuyumcuoglu, U.
    Kale, A.
    Erdemoglu, M.
    Caca, F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 30 (02) : 178 - 180
  • [9] Preoperative Evaluation of Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm Index in Prediction of Malignancy of Adnexal Masses
    Farzaneh, Farah
    Honarvar, Zahra
    Yaraghi, Mansoore
    Yaseri, Mehdi
    Arab, Maliheh
    Hosseini, Maryamsadat
    Ashrafgangoi, Tahereh
    [J]. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 16 (06)
  • [10] Assessment of diagnostic value of Serum Ca-125 and risk of malignancy index scoring in the evaluation of adnexal masses
    Khoiwal, Kavita
    Bahadur, Anupama
    Kumari, Ranjeeta
    Bhattacharya, Namrata
    Rao, Shalinee
    Chaturvedi, Jaya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MID-LIFE HEALTH, 2019, 10 (04) : 192 - 196