Comparison of Droplet Deposition Control Efficacy on Phytophthora capsica and Aphids in the Processing Pepper Field of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Knapsack Sprayer

被引:37
|
作者
Xiao, Qinggang [1 ]
Du, Rui [1 ]
Yang, Lin [1 ]
Han, Xiaoqiang [1 ]
Zhao, Sifeng [1 ]
Zhang, Guoqiang [1 ]
Fu, Wei [2 ]
Wang, Guobin [3 ]
Lan, Yubin [4 ]
机构
[1] Shihezi Univ, Coll Agr, Key Lab Oasis Agr Pest Management & Plant Protect, Shihezi 832002, Peoples R China
[2] Hainan Univ, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Haikou 570228, Hainan, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ Technol, Coll Agr Engn & Food Sci, Shandong Prov Engn Technol Res Ctr Agr Aviat Inte, Zibo 255022, Peoples R China
[4] South China Agr Univ, Coll Engn, Natl Ctr Int Collaborat Res Precis Agr Aviat Pest, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
unmanned aerial vehicle; processing pepper; droplets deposition; Phytophthora capsici and aphids; control efficiency; PESTICIDE APPLICATION; VOLUME; SIZE;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy10020215
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Processing pepper planting and processing have become an important red pillar industry in Xinjiang. With the continuous growth of processing pepper planting areas in Xinjiang, diseases and pests are increasing year by year. The aim of this study was to compare the droplet deposition and control efficiency of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) sprayers on a processing pepper field. The UAV sprayer had a poor droplet coverage rate, droplet density, and deposition uniformity, but displayed the best deposition (1.01 mu g/cm(2), which was 98% more than the EAP sprayer). The control efficacy of the UAV sprayer on processing pepper fields with Phytophthora capsici and aphids was slightly lower than that of the EAP sprayer. When the UAV sprayer was used to control processing pepper diseases and pests, it could reduce the pesticide dosage on the premise of ensuring the control effect. Further study of the residue of high concentration pesticides in pepper fruit and environment sprayed by UAVs are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Comparison of Spray Deposition, Control Efficacy on Wheat Aphids and Working Efficiency in the Wheat Field of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Boom Sprayer and Two Conventional Knapsack Sprayers
    Wang, Guobin
    Lan, Yubin
    Yuan, Huizhu
    Qi, Haixia
    Chen, Pengchao
    Ouyang, Fan
    Han, Yuxing
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [2] Comparison of Droplet Deposition, 28-Homobrassinolide Dosage Efficacy and Working Efficiency of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Knapsack Manual Sprayer in the Maize Field
    Hussain, Mujahid
    Wang, Zhao
    Huang, Guanmin
    Mo, You
    Kaousar, Rehana
    Duan, Liusheng
    Tan, Weiming
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [3] Analysis of droplet deposition and maize (Zea mays L.) growth control: Application of ethephon by small unmanned aerial vehicle and electric knapsack sprayer
    Wang, Zhao
    Hussain, Mujahid
    Yin, Jiaming
    Yuan, Mengying
    Mo, You
    Quan, Mengping
    Duan, Liusheng
    Tan, Weiming
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2023, 292
  • [4] Better Droplet Deposition and Internode Shortening Effects of Plant Growth Regulator EDAH on Maize Applied by Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Than Electric Knapsack Sprayer
    Wang, Zhao
    Hussain, Mujahid
    Huang, Guanmin
    Yin, Jiaming
    Guo, Yuling
    Mo, You
    Duan, Liusheng
    Li, Zhaohu
    Tan, Weiming
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [5] Effect of aerial application of adjuvants on pepper defoliant droplet deposition and efficacy of defoliation sprayed by unmanned aerial vehicles
    Liu, Yapeng
    Xiao, Qinggang
    Han, Xiaoqiang
    Zeeshan, Muhammad
    Fang, Zhihao
    Dou, Zechen
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [6] Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer: effect of spray volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat
    Wang, Guobin
    Lan, Yubin
    Qi, Haixia
    Chen, Pengchao
    Hewitt, Andrew
    Han, Yuxing
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 75 (06) : 1546 - 1555
  • [7] Comparison of the physical spray efficacy between unmanned helicopter and motorized knapsack sprayer in Thai paddy field
    Punyawattoe, Pruetthichat
    Sutjaritthammajariyangkun, Woravit
    Thirawut, Supangkana
    Chaiyasing, Nalina
    Supornsin, Suchada
    Sampaothong, Sonthaya
    Nagura, Tomohiro
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 9 (04):
  • [8] Evaluation of droplet deposition and efficiency of 28-homobrassinolide sprayed with unmanned aerial spraying system and electric air-pressure knapsack sprayer over wheat field
    Hussain, Mujahid
    Wang, Zhao
    Huang, Guanmin
    Mo, You
    Guo, Yuling
    Kaousar, Rehana
    Duan, Liusheng
    Tan, Weiming
    Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 202
  • [9] Evaluation of droplet deposition and efficiency of 28-homobrassinolide sprayed with unmanned aerial spraying system and electric air-pressure knapsack sprayer over wheat field
    Hussain, Mujahid
    Wang, Zhao
    Huang, Guanmin
    Mo, You
    Guo, Yuling
    Kaousar, Rehana
    Duan, Liusheng
    Tan, Weiming
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2022, 202
  • [10] Effect of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flight Height on Droplet Distribution, Drift and Control of Cotton Aphids and Spider Mites
    Lou, Zhaoxia
    Xin, Fang
    Han, Xiaoqiang
    Lan, Yubin
    Duan, Tianzhu
    Fu, Wei
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2018, 8 (09):