Non-invasive markers of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

被引:49
|
作者
Decramer, Stephane
Bascands, Jean-Loup
Schanstra, Joost P.
机构
[1] INSERM, U858 12MR, Team 5 Renal & Cardiac Remodelling, F-31432 Toulouse, France
[2] Univ Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Inst Med Mol Rangueil, F-31000 Toulouse, France
[3] Hop Enfants, Ctr Ref Sud Ouest Malaides Renales Rares, Toulouse, France
关键词
proteomics; urine; prognosis; pediatrics; congenital obstructive uropathies;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-007-0201-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Non-invasive prognosis of the clinical progression of disease is of high interest, especially in newborn and children. Neonatal ureteropelvic (UPJ) junction obstruction needs close and invasive surveillance to determine the necessity of pyeloplasty. A number of groups have initiated research with the aim to find non-invasive biomarkers for UPJ obstruction. Two different strategies have been followed. One strategy, based on the knowledge obtained in animal models of UPJ obstruction, has identified a number of individual urinary markers of severe UPJ obstruction. Combining these markers might allow prediction of which patients will require surgery and in which patients UPJ obstruction will spontaneously resolve. The other strategy is based on urinary proteomics. In this strategy the entire urinary proteome is probed for a set of biomarkers that correlates with the degree of UPJ obstruction. In subsequent steps, these sets of urinary biomarkers are used for prediction of the clinical evolution of UPJ obstruction patients. This proteomic-based strategy allowed prediction, several months in advance, of the clinical evolution of neonates with UPJ-obstruction. Both strategies will be complementary and will hopefully replace in the near future the invasive follow-up of newborns with UPJ obstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 465
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-invasive markers of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Stephane Decramer
    Jean-Loup Bascands
    Joost P. Schanstra
    World Journal of Urology, 2007, 25 : 457 - 465
  • [2] Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Renner, C
    Rassweiler, J
    UROLOGE A, 2002, 41 (02): : 150 - 158
  • [3] Prognostic markers in unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Bayram, Y.
    Bayazit, A. Karabay
    Noyan, A.
    Yavuz, S.
    Anarat, R.
    Anarat, A.
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 26 (09) : 1692 - 1693
  • [4] Minimally Invasive Approaches to Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
    Canes, David
    Berger, Andre
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    Desai, Mihir M.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 35 (03) : 425 - 439
  • [5] The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Yanke, Brent V.
    Lallas, Costas D.
    Pagnani, Chris
    McGinnis, Dave
    Bagley, Demetrius H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 54 - 54
  • [6] Ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Lam, John S.
    Breda, Alberto
    Schulam, Peter G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (05): : 1652 - 1658
  • [7] Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
    Hashim, Hashim
    Woodhouse, Christopher R. J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (02) : 25 - 32
  • [8] OBSTRUCTION OF THE URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION
    BARBER, KE
    AMA AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1951, 81 (06): : 863 - 863
  • [9] Ureteropelvic junction obstruction?
    White, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (02) : 507 - 508
  • [10] URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION
    BUTLER, ML
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1979, 1 (04) : 337 - 340