Normative, livelihood, and demographic influences on enrollment in a payment for ecosystem services program

被引:6
|
作者
Giefer, Madeline M. [1 ]
An, Li [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Xiaodong [4 ]
机构
[1] Austin Peay State Univ, Dept Geosci, POB 4418, Clarksville, TN 37044 USA
[2] Dept Geog, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Ctr Complex Human Environm Syst, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Social norms; Sloping Land Conversion Program; Land use; Grain to Green Program; China; PES; RURAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME; FOR-GREEN PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL-SERVICES; COLLECTIVE ACTION; SOCIAL NORMS; PARTICIPATION; CHINA; CONSERVATION; GRAIN; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105525
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Payment for ecosystem services (PES) has emerged as a leading conservation mechanism worldwide, and its success depends largely on landholders' willingness to enroll in and comply with these programs. Researchers have suggested program duration and perceived social norms may influence enrollment, but empirical evidence is sparse. There is also conflict over the influence of other socioeconomic, demographic, and farm characteristics. This study, based in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve in southwestern China, uses a choice experiment and mixed-effects model to quantify how payment level, duration of program, social norms, and demographic and economic factors affect farmers' willingness to enroll in a PES program. Results suggest higher neighbor participation increases willingness to enroll, as does higher payment level, but contract duration does not. Other factors associated with higher enrollment include being allowed to plant economically productive trees, having lower educational attainment, having local off-farm work, owning no livestock, and not having lived in one's current neighborhood since birth. These results suggest PES implementers may improve enrollment by targeting households with these conducive characteristics and by utilizing tree species with sellable products like tea and herbs. Moreover, results suggest implementers may improve enrollment by emphasizing neighbors' enrollment while recruiting new participants, thereby capitalizing on perceived social norms.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program
    Zheng, Hua
    Robinson, Brian E.
    Liang, Yi-Cheng
    Polasky, Stephen
    Ma, Dong-Chun
    Wang, Feng-Chun
    Ruckelshaus, Mary
    Ouyang, Zhi-Yun
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (41) : 16681 - 16686
  • [2] Adding the temporal dimension to spatial patterns of payment for ecosystem services enrollment
    Nunez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
    Fletcher, Robert J., Jr.
    Pienaar, Elizabeth F.
    Branch, Lyn C.
    Volante, Jose N.
    Rifai, Sami
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 36
  • [3] Heterogeneous attitudes towards a Payment for Ecosystem Services program
    Felardo, Jeff
    Berrens, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS & STATISTICS, 2018, 39 (01) : 112 - 131
  • [4] Livelihood Sustainability Assessment of Payment for Ecosystem Services Providers in Cidanau Watershed, Banten Province
    Biru, Muhammad Diheim
    Karuniasa, Mahawan
    Mizuno, Kosuke
    JURNAL MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA, 2023, 29 (03): : 161 - 177
  • [5] Payment for Ecosystem Services
    不详
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2014, 90 (01): : 26 - 26
  • [6] Rancher Preferences for a Payment for Ecosystem Services Program in Southwestern Wyoming
    Hansen, Kristiana
    Duke, Esther
    Bond, Craig
    Purcell, Melanie
    Paige, Ginger
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 146 : 240 - 249
  • [7] Credibility measurement as a tool for conserving nature: Chinese herders' livelihood capitals and payment for grassland ecosystem services
    Fan, Shengyue
    He, Miao
    Zhang, Tianyu
    Huo, Yajing
    Fan, Di
    LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 115
  • [8] Conservation and livelihood outcomes of payment for ecosystem services in the Ecuadorian Andes: What is the potential for 'win-win'?
    Bremer, Leah L.
    Farley, Kathleen A.
    Lopez-Carr, David
    Romero, Jose
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 8 : 148 - 165
  • [9] Payment for Ecosystem Services from Forests
    Alix-Garcia, Jennifer
    Wolff, Hendrik
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 6, 2014, 6 : 361 - 380
  • [10] MARKET ASSESSMENT OF PAYMENT FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
    Sergeevna, Sergushina Elena
    Vladimirovich, Kabanov Oleg
    Igorevna, Lazareva Alina
    Talhauly, Aimen Anuarbek
    Darya, Atasheva
    Alexandrochich, Lyalin Evgeny
    Vladimirovich, Pichugin Dmitry
    Aleksandrovich, Baulin Mikhail
    Viktorovich, Bartsaykin Alexey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOSYSTEMS AND ECOLOGY SCIENCE-IJEES, 2022, 12 (01): : 149 - 158