A study on the morphometric analysis of glenoid cavity of scapula using a polymerizing acrylic mould

被引:1
|
作者
Gnanasundaram, Vaithianathan [1 ]
Rajilarajendran, Hannahsugirthabai [1 ]
Balaji, Thotakura [1 ]
机构
[1] Chettinad Acad Res & Educ, Chettinad Hosp & Res Inst, Dept Anat, IT Highway Kelambakkam, Chennai 603103, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Glenoid cavity; Acrylic mould; Surface area; Diameters; Arthroplasty; ARTHROPLASTY; SEX;
D O I
10.52083/ATJJ6704
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The shoulder joint is the most commonly dislocated joint in the body. Several conditions can cause shoulder disability, like avascular necrosis, rotator cuff tear, or fractures. Therefore, patients are advised to consider shoulder joint replacement surgery as a long-term remedy. Glenoid component loosening is a long-term complication seen in arthroplasty. Biomechanics of the reconstructed glenohumeral joint need a better understanding, so that the reason behind glenoid component loosening can be identified. The goal of this study is to record and analyze the various parameters using a mould. In this study, 106 scapulae with intact glenoid were included in the study. Acrylic moulds were measured with a vernier caliper. The values were found to be symmetrical with respect to the right and left sides. New parameters which were studied include the thickness of the mould. The mean values at T1, T2, T3 were 2.95 +/- 0.75 mm, 2.67 +/- 0.74 mm, 2.26 +/- 0.55 mm respectively. The statistical significance was observed with the parameters. P-value was 0.002, 0.001 and 0.001 between Surface area AP1, SI AP and AP1 T1 respectively. The dimensions which were from a mould give an added information about the depth of glenoid component, used for total shoulder arthroplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 301
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Morphometric Study of Glenoid Cavity of Human Scapula in Central India
    Thute, Preeti Prabhakarrao
    Keche, Harsha Atul
    Fulmali, Darshna Gulabrao
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2020, 9 (33): : 2340 - 2344
  • [2] MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GLENOID FOSSA OF SCAPULA
    Gupta, Sangeeta
    Magotra, Rachna
    Kour, Manmeet
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (45): : 7761 - 7766
  • [3] Laser morphometric analysis of the glenoid fossa of the scapula
    Monk, AP
    Berry, E
    Limb, D
    Soames, RW
    CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2001, 14 (05) : 320 - 323
  • [4] Morphometric analysis and surgical anatomy of coracoid process and glenoid cavity
    Kalra, Sunita
    Thamke, Swati
    Khandelwal, Ankit
    Khorwal, Gitanjali
    JOURNAL OF THE ANATOMICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2016, 65 (02) : 114 - 117
  • [5] A Morphometric Study of the Patterns and Variations of the Acromion and Glenoid Cavity of the Scapulae in Egyptian Population
    El-Din, Wael Amin Nasr
    Ali, Mona Hassan Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (08) : AC8 - AC11
  • [6] Sex discrimination from the glenoid cavity in black South Africans: morphometric analysis of digital photographs
    P. James Macaluso
    International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2011, 125 : 773 - 778
  • [7] Sex discrimination from the glenoid cavity in black South Africans: morphometric analysis of digital photographs
    Macaluso, P. James, Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2011, 125 (06) : 773 - 778
  • [8] Is the scapula a good indicator of taxonomy?: A geometric morphometric analysis using macaque monkeys
    Kenyon-Flatt, Brittany
    von Cramon-Taubadel, Noreen
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2020, 34
  • [9] Design and analysis of multi cavity injection mould using solidworks
    Arora, Arpit
    Pathak, Arpit
    Juneja, Akshat
    Shakkarwal, Pankaj
    Kumar, Rajender
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 56 : 3648 - 3650
  • [10] Influence of the Labrum on Version and Diameter of the Glenoid: A Morphometric Study Using Magnetic Resonance Images
    Anthony, Joyce
    Varughese, Ibin
    Glatt, Vaida
    Tetsworth, Kevin
    Hohmann, Erik
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (08): : 1442 - 1447