GAAT: Group Adaptive Adversarial Training to Improve the Trade-Off Between Robustness and Accuracy

被引:1
|
作者
Qian, Yaguan [1 ]
Liang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Kang, Ming [1 ]
Wang, Bin [2 ]
Gu, Zhaoquan [3 ]
Wang, Xing [2 ]
Wu, Chunming [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Sci, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Key Lab Multidimens Percept Technol, Applicat & Cybersecur, Hangzhou 310051, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ, Cyberspace Inst Adv Technol CIAT, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Trade-off; adversarial training; perturbation budget; adaptive;
D O I
10.1142/S0218001422510156
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Adversarial training is by far one of the most effective methods to improve the robustness of deep neural networks against adversarial examples. However, the trade-off between robustness and accuracy is still a challenge in adversarial training. Previous methods used adversarial examples with a fixed perturbation budget or specific perturbation budgets for each example, which is inefficient in improving the trade-off and lacks the ability to control the trade-off flexibly. In this paper, we show that the largest element of logit, zmax, can roughly represent the minimum distance between an example and its neighboring decision boundary. Thus, we propose group adaptive adversarial training (GAAT) that divides the training dataset into several groups based on zmax and develops a binary search algorithm to determine the group perturbation budgets for each group. Using the group perturbation budgets to perform adversarial training can fine-tune the trade-off between robustness and accuracy. Extensive experiments conducted on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet-30 show that our GAAT can achieve a more perfect trade-off than TRADES, MMA, and MART.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the Trade-off between Adversarial and Backdoor Robustness
    Weng, Cheng-Hsin
    Lee, Yan-Ting
    Wu, Shan-Hung
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 33, NEURIPS 2020, 2020, 33
  • [2] FLOAT: Fast Learnable Once-for-All Adversarial Training for Tunable Trade-off between Accuracy and Robustness
    Kundu, Souvik
    Sundaresan, Sairam
    Pedram, Massoud
    Beerel, Peter A.
    [J]. 2023 IEEE/CVF WINTER CONFERENCE ON APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTER VISION (WACV), 2023, : 2348 - 2357
  • [3] Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracy of Vision Transformers
    Li, Yanxi
    Xu, Chang
    [J]. 2023 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, CVPR, 2023, : 7558 - 7568
  • [4] Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracy
    Zhang, Hongyang
    Yu, Yaodong
    Jiao, Jiantao
    Xing, Eric P.
    El Ghaoui, Laurent
    Jordan, Michael I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 97, 2019, 97
  • [5] Trade-Off Between Robustness and Rewards Adversarial Training for Deep Reinforcement Learning Under Large Perturbations
    Huang, Jeffrey
    Choi, Ho Jin
    Figueroa, Nadia
    [J]. IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS, 2023, 8 (12) : 8018 - 8025
  • [6] Can we have it all? On the Trade-off between Spatial and Adversarial Robustness of Neural Networks
    Kamath, Sandesh
    Deshpande, Amit
    Subrahmanyam, K. V.
    Balasubramanian, Vineeth N.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 34 (NEURIPS 2021), 2021, 34
  • [7] Generalized light robustness and the trade-off between robustness and nominal quality
    Anita Schöbel
    [J]. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2014, 80 : 161 - 191
  • [8] Generalized light robustness and the trade-off between robustness and nominal quality
    Schoebel, Anita
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL METHODS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2014, 80 (02) : 161 - 191
  • [9] Perturbation-Invariant Adversarial Training for Neural Ranking Models: Improving the Effectiveness-Robustness Trade-Off
    Liu, Yu-An
    Zhang, Ruqing
    Zhang, Mingkun
    Chen, Wei
    de Rijke, Maarten
    Guo, Jiafeng
    Cheng, Xueqi
    [J]. THIRTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 38 NO 8, 2024, : 8832 - 8840
  • [10] Dimensionality Reduction for Data Visualization and Linear Classification, and the Trade-off between Robustness and Classification Accuracy
    Becker, Martin
    Lippel, Jens
    Zielke, Thomas
    [J]. 2020 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICPR), 2021, : 6478 - 6485