A Multi-level model for activity commitments in e-contracts

被引:0
|
作者
Vidyasankar, K. [1 ]
Krishna, P. Radha [2 ]
Karlapalem, Kamalakar [3 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Comp Sci, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
[2] Inst Dev & Res Bank Tchnol, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] Internatl Inst Informat Technol, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
An e-contract is a contract modeled, specified, executed, controlled and monitored by a software system. A contract is a legal agreement involving parties, activities, clauses and payments. The goals of an e-contract include precise specification of the activities of the contract, mapping them into deployable workflows, and providing transactional support in their execution. Activities in a contract are complex and interdependent. They may be executed by different parties autonomously and in a loosely coupled fashion. They may be compensated and/or re-executed at different times relative to the execution of other activities. Both the initial specification of the activities and the later verification of their executions with respect to compliance to the clauses are tedious and complicated. We believe that an c-contract should reflect both the specification and the execution aspects of the activities at the same time, where the former is about the composition logic and the later about the transactional properties. Towards facilitating this, we propose a multi-level composition model for activities in e-contracts. Our model allows for the specification of a number of transactional properties, like atomicity and commitment, for activities at all levels of the composition. In addition to their novelty, the transactional properties help to coordinate payments and eventual closure of the contract.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital Platform Model For E-Contracts
    Popescu, Mihai Valeriu
    Simion, Petronela Cristina
    Popescu, Mirona Ana Maria
    Barbu, Andreea
    Costea-Marcu, Iustina-Cristina
    [J]. EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2020, : 11178 - 11183
  • [2] Defeasible reasoning with e-contracts
    Giannikis, Georgios K.
    Daskalopulu, Aspassia
    [J]. 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT AGENT TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 690 - +
  • [3] From contracts to e-contracts: Modeling and enactment
    Krishna P.R.
    Karlapalem K.
    Dani A.R.
    [J]. Information Technology and Management, 2005, 6 (4) : 363 - 387
  • [4] The representation of e-contracts as default theories
    Giannikis, Georgios K.
    Daskalopulu, Aspassia
    [J]. NEW TRENDS IN APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4570 : 963 - +
  • [5] Monitoring compliance with E-contracts and norms
    Modgil, Sanjay
    Oren, Nir
    Faci, Noura
    Meneguzzi, Felipe
    Miles, Simon
    Luck, Michael
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 2015, 23 (02) : 161 - 196
  • [6] Towards formal modeling of e-contracts
    Marjanovic, O
    Milosevic, Z
    [J]. FIFTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE DISTRIBUTED OBJECT COMPUTING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 59 - 68
  • [7] A Methodology for Evolving E-Contracts Using Templates
    Krishna, P. Radha
    Karlapalem, Kamalakar
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING, 2013, 6 (04) : 497 - 510
  • [8] Timed Automata Semantics for Visual e-Contracts
    Martinez, Enrique
    Cambronero, M. Emilia
    Diaz, Gregorio
    Schneider, Gerardo
    [J]. ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2011, (68): : 7 - 21
  • [9] Specification and Verification of Security Properties of e-Contracts
    Abou El Kalam, Anas
    Idboutker, Nourredine
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (COMM), 2010, : 427 - 430
  • [10] Inter-organisational collaborations supported by e-contracts
    Milosevic, Z
    Linington, PF
    Gibson, S
    Kulkarni, S
    Cole, J
    [J]. BUILDING THE E-SERVICE SOCIETY: E-COMMERCE, E-BUSINESS, AND E-GOVERNMENT, 2004, 146 : 413 - 429