Japanese preference weights of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer)

被引:0
|
作者
Shiroiwa, Takeru [1 ]
Nakamura-Thomas, Hiromi [2 ]
Yamaguchi, Mai [3 ]
Morikawa, Mie [4 ]
Moriyama, Yoko [5 ]
Fukuda, Takashi [1 ]
Allan, Stephen [6 ]
Malley, Juliette [7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Ctr Outcomes Res & Econ Evaluat Hlth C2H, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako, Saitama 3510197, Japan
[2] Saitama Prefectural Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Med & Welf, Sch Occupat Therapy, 820 Sannomiya, Koshigaya, Saitama 3438540, Japan
[3] Japan Lutheran Coll, 3-10-20 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 1810015, Japan
[4] Tsuda Univ, Dept Policy Studies, Shibuya Ku, 1-18-24 Sendagaya, Tokyo 1510051, Japan
[5] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth & Welf Serv, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako, Saitama 3510197, Japan
[6] Univ Kent, Personal Social Serv Res Unit PSSRU, Canterbury CT2 7NF, Kent, England
[7] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Care Policy & Evaluat Ctr CPEC, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
ASCOT; Preference; Best-worst scaling (BWS); Time trade-off (TTO); Quality of life; Caregiver; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INFORMAL CARE; INCLUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-021-03076-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose We developed preference weights of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer) in Japan. Methods We used best-worst scaling (BWS) and composite time trade-off (cTTO) to determine the preference weights for ASCOT-Carer states in the general population. TTO values were applied to convert the BWS scores to utilities. The sample number was approximately 1000 for the BWS survey and 200 for the TTO survey. Whereas face-to-face surveys by computer-assisted interviewing were adopted for the TTO tasks, a web-based survey was used for the BWS tasks. In the BWS tasks, the ASCOT-Carer states were presented, and the "best," "worst," "second best," and "second worst" domains in a profile were selected. A mixed logit model was applied to the BWS data. Results The respondents' background was similar to that of the general population, although the number of people in the age and sex categories was equal. The preference weights for calculating the utilities of the ASCOT-Carer states were estimated. The estimated utilities of the ASCOT-Carer states were distributed between 1 and 0.02. All preference weights were consistent. The item with the highest preference weight was level 1 in the "space and time to be yourself." The least preferred item was level 4 in the "space and time to be yourself" and "control over daily life" domains. Conclusion We established Japanese preference weights for ASCOT-Carer states, the first weights of an Asian country. The estimated utilities can contribute to the measurement of caregivers' social care-related QoL and perform of cost-effectiveness analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:2143 / 2151
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Japanese preference weights of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer)
    Takeru Shiroiwa
    Hiromi Nakamura-Thomas
    Mai Yamaguchi
    Mie Morikawa
    Yoko Moriyama
    Takashi Fukuda
    Stephen Allan
    Juliette Malley
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2022, 31 : 2143 - 2151
  • [2] Factor structure and construct validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer)
    Stacey E. Rand
    Juliette N. Malley
    Ann P. Netten
    Julien E. Forder
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 2601 - 2614
  • [3] Factor structure and construct validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer)
    Rand, Stacey E.
    Malley, Juliette N.
    Netten, Ann P.
    Forder, Julien E.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (11) : 2601 - 2614
  • [4] Valuing informal carers’ quality of life using best-worst scaling—Finnish preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer)
    Lien Nguyen
    Hanna Jokimäki
    Ismo Linnosmaa
    Eirini-Christina Saloniki
    Laurie Batchelder
    Juliette Malley
    Hui Lu
    Peter Burge
    Birgit Trukeschitz
    Julien Forder
    [J]. The European Journal of Health Economics, 2022, 23 : 357 - 374
  • [5] Valuing informal carers' quality of life using best-worst scaling-Finnish preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer)
    Nguyen, Lien
    Jokimaki, Hanna
    Linnosmaa, Ismo
    Saloniki, Eirini-Christina
    Batchelder, Laurie
    Malley, Juliette
    Lu, Hui
    Burge, Peter
    Trukeschitz, Birgit
    Forder, Julien
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2022, 23 (03): : 357 - 374
  • [6] What's important when caring for a loved one? Population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal carers (ASCOT-Carer) for Austria
    Trukeschitz, Birgit
    Hajji, Assma
    Batchelder, Laurie
    Saloniki, Eirini
    Linnosmaa, Ismo
    Malley, Juliette
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (07) : 1975 - 1984
  • [7] What’s important when caring for a loved one? Population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal carers (ASCOT-Carer) for Austria
    Birgit Trukeschitz
    Assma Hajji
    Laurie Batchelder
    Eirini Saloniki
    Ismo Linnosmaa
    Juliette Malley
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 1975 - 1984
  • [8] Translation, cultural adaptation and construct validity of the German version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal Carers (German ASCOT-Carer)
    Birgit Trukeschitz
    Assma Hajji
    Judith Litschauer
    Juliette Malley
    Adiam Schoch
    Stacey Rand
    Ismo Linnosmaa
    Julien Forder
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 905 - 920
  • [9] Translation, cultural adaptation and construct validity of the German version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal Carers (German ASCOT-Carer)
    Trukeschitz, Birgit
    Hajji, Assma
    Litschauer, Judith
    Malley, Juliette
    Schoch, Adiam
    Rand, Stacey
    Linnosmaa, Ismo
    Forder, Julien
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (03) : 905 - 920
  • [10] CARER SOCIAL CARE-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES: ESTABLISHING PREFERENCE WEIGHTS FOR THE ADULT SOCIAL CARE OUTCOMES TOOLKIT FOR CARERS
    Batchelder, L.
    Saloniki, E.
    Malley, J.
    Burge, P.
    Lu, H.
    Forder, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A11 - A12