共 50 条
Meaning-Centered Pain Coping Skills Training: A Pilot Feasibility Trial of a Psychosocial Pain Management Intervention for Patients with Advanced Cancer
被引:12
|作者:
Winger, Joseph G.
[1
]
Ramos, Katherine
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
]
Kelleher, Sarah A.
[1
]
Somers, Tamara J.
[1
]
Steinhauser, Karen E.
[2
,3
,4
,6
]
Porter, Laura S.
[1
]
Kamal, Arif H.
[4
,7
,8
]
Breitbart, William S.
[9
]
Keefe, Francis J.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Sch Med, 2200 West Main St,Suite 340, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Study Human Aging & Dev, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Durham VA Med Ctr, Ctr Innovat Accelerate Discovery & Practice Trans, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[5] Durham VA Med Ctr, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr GRECC, Durham, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[7] Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC USA
[8] Duke Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC USA
[9] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词:
meaning in life;
meaning-centered psychotherapy;
Pain Coping Skills Training;
pain management;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
GROUP-PSYCHOTHERAPY;
DISTRESS;
SENSE;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
SPIRITUALITY;
PREVALENCE;
VALIDATION;
DISEASE;
ANXIETY;
D O I:
10.1089/jpm.2021.0081
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Pain from advanced cancer can greatly reduce patients' physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being. Objective: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a behavioral pain management intervention, Meaning-Centered Pain Coping Skills Training (MCPC). Design: This trial used a single-arm feasibility design. Setting/Subjects: Thirty participants with stage IV solid tumor cancer, moderate-to-severe pain, and clinically elevated distress were enrolled from a tertiary cancer center in the United States. The manualized protocol was delivered across four 45- to 60-minute videoconference sessions. Measurements: Feasibility and acceptability were assessed through accrual, session/assessment completion, intervention satisfaction, and coping skills usage. Participants completed validated measures of primary outcomes (i.e., pain severity, pain interference, and spiritual well-being) and secondary outcomes at baseline, post-intervention, and four-week follow-up. Results: Eighty-eight percent (38/43) of patients who completed screening met inclusion criteria, and 79% (30/38) consented and completed baseline assessment. Sixty-seven percent (20/30) of participants were female (mean age = 57). Most participants were White/Caucasian (77%; 23/30) or Black/African American (17%; 5/30) with at least some college education (90%; 27/30). Completion rates for intervention sessions and both post-intervention assessments were 90% (27/30), 87% (26/30), and 77% (23/30), respectively. At the post-intervention assessment, participants reported a high degree of intervention satisfaction (mean = 3.53/4.00; SD = 0.46), and 81% (21/26) reported weekly use of coping skills that they learned. Participants also showed improvement from baseline on all primary outcomes and nearly all secondary outcomes at both post-intervention assessments. Conclusions: MCPC demonstrated strong feasibility and acceptability. Findings warrant further evaluation of MCPC in a randomized controlled trial. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03207360
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 69
页数:10
相关论文