Mapping the Seabed and Shallow Subsurface with Multi-Frequency Multibeam Echosounders

被引:35
|
作者
Gaida, Timo C. [1 ]
Mohammadloo, Tannaz H. [1 ]
Snellen, Mirjam [1 ,2 ]
Simons, Dick G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, Acoust Grp, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
[2] Deltares, Dept Appl Geol & Geophys, NL-3508 AL Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
backscatter; multispectral; signal penetration; multibeam; acoustics; marine sediments; sediment classification; ACOUSTIC BACKSCATTER; ANGULAR RESPONSE; FREQUENCY; CLASSIFICATION; SEDIMENTS; STRENGTH; WATER;
D O I
10.3390/rs12010052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Multi-frequency multibeam backscatter (BS) has indicated, in particular for fine sediments, the potential for increasing the discrimination between different seabed environments. Fine sediments are expected to have a varying signal penetration within the frequency range of modern multibeam echosounders (MBESs). Therefore, it is unknown to what extent the multispectral MBES data represent the surface of the seabed or different parts of the subsurface. Here, the effect of signal penetration on the measured multi-frequency BS and bathymetry is investigated. To this end, two multi-frequency datasets (90 to 450 kHz) were acquired with an R2Sonic 2026 MBES, supported by ground-truthing, in the Vlietland Lake and Port of Rotterdam (The Netherlands). In addition, a model to simulate the MBES bathymetric measurements in a layered medium is developed. The measured bathymetry difference between the lowest (90 kHz) and highest frequency (450 kHz) in areas with muddy sediments reaches values up to 60 cm dependent on the location and incident angle. In spatial correspondence with the variation in the depth difference, the BS level at the lowest frequency varies by up to 15 dB for the muddy sediments while the BS at the highest frequency shows only small variations. A comparison of the acoustic results with the ground-truthing, geological setting and model indicates that the measured bathymetry and BS at the different frequencies correspond to different parts of the seabed. However, the low-frequency BS cannot be directly related to a subsurface layer because of a significant sound attenuation in the upper layer. The simulation of the MBES bottom detection indicates that the bathymetry measured at the highest and lowest frequency can be used to determine the thickness of thin layers (similar to 20 cm). However, with an increasing layer thickness, the bottom detection becomes more sensitive to the incident angle and small variations in the sediment properties. Consequently, an accurate determination of the layer thickness is hampered. Based on this study, it is highly recommended to analyze multi-frequency BS in combination with the inter-frequency bathymetry difference to ensure a correct interpretation and classification of multi-frequency BS data.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Underwater Multi-frequency Transmitter for Seabed Characterization
    Di Marcoberardino, Lucilla
    Marchal, Jacques
    Cervenka, Pierre
    [J]. 2011 IEEE - OCEANS SPAIN, 2011,
  • [2] Methodical features of mapping underwater topography with multibeam echosounders
    Turko, NN
    Agapova, GV
    [J]. OCEANOLOGY, 2003, 43 (02) : 285 - 292
  • [3] A Multispectral Bayesian Classification Method for Increased Acoustic Discrimination of Seabed Sediments Using Multi-Frequency Multibeam Backscatter Data
    Gaida, Timo C.
    Ali, Tengku Afrizal Tengku
    Snellen, Mirjam
    Amiri-Simkooei, Alireza
    van Dijk, Thaienne A. G. P.
    Simons, Dick G.
    [J]. GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 8 (12):
  • [4] Comparison of Multi-Frequency and Multi-Coil Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) for Mapping Properties in Shallow Podsolic Soils
    Altdorff, Daniel
    Sadatcharam, Kamaleswaran
    Unc, Adrian
    Krishnapillai, Manokarajah
    Galagedara, Lakshman
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (08)
  • [5] A multi-frequency polarimetric scattering model for subsurface structure detection
    Shishkova, O
    Hajnsek, I
    [J]. IGARSS 2004: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7: SCIENCE FOR SOCIETY: EXPLORING AND MANAGING A CHANGING PLANET, 2004, : 2499 - 2502
  • [6] Multi-Frequency, Multi-Sonar Mapping of Shallow HabitatsEfficacy and Management Implications in the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece
    Fakiris, Elias
    Blondel, Philippe
    Papatheodorou, George
    Christodoulou, Dimitris
    Dimas, Xenophon
    Georgiou, Nikos
    Kordella, Stavroula
    Dimitriadis, Charalampos
    Rzhanov, Yuri
    Geraga, Maria
    Ferentinos, George
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (04)
  • [7] Characterisation of a Multi-frequency Wound Impedance Mapping Instrument
    Weber, Sonja. A.
    Gehin, Claudine
    Moddy, Gillian
    Jossinet, Jacques
    McAdams, Eric T.
    [J]. 2008 30TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 4907 - +
  • [8] Numerical Analysis of the Performance of a Multi-Frequency Inversion Scheme for Subsurface Prospection
    Fedeli, A.
    Pastorino, M.
    Randazzo, A.
    [J]. 2017 11TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (EUCAP), 2017, : 1718 - 1722
  • [9] Multi-Frequency Microwave Radiometry for Retrieving Antarctic Firn Subsurface Temperatures
    Kar, Rahul
    Aksoy, Mustafa
    Kaurejo, Dua
    [J]. 2022 3RD URSI ATLANTIC AND ASIA PACIFIC RADIO SCIENCE MEETING (AT-AP-RASC), 2022,
  • [10] Examining the Links between Multi-Frequency Multibeam Backscatter Data and Sediment Grain Size
    Runya, Robert Mzungu
    McGonigle, Chris
    Quinn, Rory
    Howe, John
    Collier, Jenny
    Fox, Clive
    Dooley, James
    O'Loughlin, Rory
    Calvert, Jay
    Scott, Louise
    Abernethy, Colin
    Evans, Will
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (08)