Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Clomiphene Citrate Supplementation May Be More Feasible for Young Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve Compared with Standard Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation: A Retrospective Study

被引:3
|
作者
Lin, Yue [1 ]
Chen, Qianqian [1 ]
Zhu, Jing [1 ]
Teng, Yili [1 ]
Huang, Xuefeng [1 ]
Chen, Xia [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Reprod Med Ctr, 96 Fuxue Rd, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
diminished ovarian reserve; clomiphene citrate; medroxyprogesterone acetate; controlled ovarian stimulation; in vitro fertilization; luteinizing hormone surge; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; LUTEINIZING-HORMONE SURGES; MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; INFERTILE WOMEN; SPERM INJECTION; HYPERSTIMULATION; SECRETION; ESTRADIOL; SITE; MG;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S338748
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Purpose: The present study was designed to compare the efficiency of the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with clomiphene citrate (CC) supplementation (PPOS+CC) and the standard PPOS protocol for women of different ages with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 364 DOR women who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with PPOS+CC (n = 223) or standard PPOS (n = 141). They were divided into subgroups based on age: <= 35 years and >35 years. Differences in baseline characteristics, ovarian stimulation characteristics, endocrinological characteristics, and clinical outcome between the two groups were assessed. Statistical analyses were stratified by age. Results: In all women with DOR, PPOS+CC was associated with a lower percentage of women with profound pituitary suppression than standard PPOS (0.0% vs 18.6%, P < 0.001 and 1.3% vs 11.0%, P = 0.002). In young women with DOR, more high-quality cleavage stage embryos were harvested (1.96 vs 1.38, P = 0.018) and a lower dosage of gonadotropin per oocyte retrieved was required (558.37 vs 909.82, P = 0.036) in PPOS+CC. In older women with DOR, PPOS+CC led to an increase in the incidence of luteinizing hormone (LH) surge levels above 10 IU/L on trigger day (12.7% vs 4.9%, P = 0.028) and a decrease in the rate of oocyte maturation (84.7% vs 89.9%, P = 0.034) compared to standard PPOS. Conclusion: Clomiphene citrate is an effective adjuvant to alleviate pituitary suppression in PPOS protocols; for young women with DOR, CC supplementation had a positive impact on the number of high-quality embryos. However, older women with DOR would be at risk of developing a premature LH surge and having poor oocyte maturation rate under the PPOS+CC protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:5087 / 5097
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation
    Giles, Juan
    Cruz, Fabio
    Garcia-Velasco, Juan A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 36 (03) : 165 - 172
  • [2] Progestin-primed milder stimulation with clomiphene citrate yields fewer oocytes and suboptimal pregnancy outcomes compared with the standard progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome
    Ye, Hongjuan
    Tian, Hui
    He, Wen
    Lyu, Qifeng
    Kuang, Yanping
    Chen, Qiuju
    Sun, Lihua
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 16 : 1 - 8
  • [3] Progestin-primed milder stimulation with clomiphene citrate yields fewer oocytes and suboptimal pregnancy outcomes compared with the standard progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome
    Hongjuan Ye
    Hui Tian
    Wen He
    Qifeng Lyu
    Yanping Kuang
    Qiuju Chen
    Lihua Sun
    [J]. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 16
  • [4] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with or without clomiphene citrate for poor ovarian responders: a retrospective cohort study
    Ahui Liu
    Jie Li
    Haofei Shen
    Lili Zhang
    Qiuyuan Li
    Xuehong Zhang
    [J]. BMC Women's Health, 22
  • [5] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with or without clomiphene citrate for poor ovarian responders: a retrospective cohort study
    Liu, Ahui
    Li, Jie
    Shen, Haofei
    Zhang, Lili
    Li, Qiuyuan
    Zhang, Xuehong
    [J]. BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation improves the outcomes of IVF/ICSI cycles in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve
    Yu, Chun-Mei
    Dai, Xiu-Liang
    Wang, Yu-Feng
    Gao, Ting-Ting
    Cao, Fang
    Xia, Xi-Yang
    Chen, Li
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 82 (11) : 845 - 848
  • [7] Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol for Patients With Endometrioma
    Yang, Ai-Min
    Feng, Teng-Fei
    Han, Yan
    Zhao, Zhi-Ming
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Yi-Zhuo
    Zuo, Xiao-Qi
    Xu, Xiuhua
    Shi, Bao-Jun
    Li, Lipeng
    Hao, Gui-Min
    Cui, Na
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [8] Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation: for whom, when and how?
    Ata, Baris
    Kalafat, Erkan
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 48 (02)
  • [9] Editorial: Recent advances in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation
    Chen, Qiuju
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [10] The progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol: more economical, but at what cost?
    Matevossian, Karine
    Sauerbrun-Cutler, May-Tal
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 118 (04) : 713 - 714