A benchmark for life cycle air emissions and life cycle impact assessment of hydrokinetic energy extraction using life cycle assessment

被引:23
|
作者
Miller, Veronica B. [1 ]
Landis, Amy E. [2 ]
Schaefer, Laura A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Energy Syst Lab, Dept Mech Engn & Mat Sci, Mascaro Ctr Sustainable Innovat,Swanson Sch Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Mascaro Ctr Sustainable Innovat, Swanson Sch Engn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Hydrokinetic energy extraction; Environmental measurement; Gorlov; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; RIVER; DAMS; CONSTRUCTION; POPULATIONS; VEGETATION; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As the demand for renewable energy increases, it becomes important to critically examine the environmental impacts of renewable energy production. Often, the approach has been trial and error in renewable energy with respect to its impact on the environment. Hydrokinetic Energy Extraction (HEE) has been seen as a potentially "benign" form of renewable hydropower. This paper provides a benchmark for initial measurement of HEE environmental impacts, since negative outcomes have been present with previously assumed "benign" renewable hydropower. A Gorlov system was used to represent a HEE system. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was utilized to compare the environmental impacts of HEE with small hydropower, coal, natural gas and nuclear power. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) criteria air emissions were quantified and compared over the life cycle of the systems. Life cycle air emissions were used in combination with TRACI to compare the systems. The Gorlov system was found to have the lowest life cycle impact with a system lifetime comparison, and did compare closely with small hydropower. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1040 / 1046
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings
    Chau, C. K.
    Leung, T. M.
    Ng, W. Y.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 : 395 - 413
  • [2] A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings (vol 143, pg 395, 2015)
    Chau, C. K.
    Leung, T. M.
    Ng, W. Y.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 158 : 656 - 656
  • [3] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA) of an innovative energy cycle with zero CO2 emissions
    Fiaschi, D
    Lombardi, L
    Manfrida, G
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 911 - 916
  • [4] Life Cycle Impact Assessment
    Saur K.
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1997, 2 (2) : 66 - 70
  • [6] ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment
    Sven -Olof Ryding
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1999, 4 (6) : 307 - 307
  • [7] Critical Analysis of Coal Life Cycle Using the Life Cycle Assessment
    Dinca, Cristian
    Badea, Adrian
    Apostol, Tiberiu
    Marculescu, Cosmin
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL II, PTS A AND B, 2009, : 578 - 586
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of energy crops
    Kaegi, Thomas
    Nemecek, Thomas
    Gaillard, Gerard
    [J]. AGRARFORSCHUNG, 2007, 14 (10): : 460 - 465
  • [9] Life cycle impact assessment: A primer
    Curran, Mary Ann
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [10] Characterisation factors for life cycle impact assessment of sound emissions
    Cucurachi, S.
    Heijungs, R.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 468 : 280 - 291