Improving wetland cover classification using artificial neural networks with ensemble techniques

被引:31
|
作者
Hu, Xudong [1 ]
Zhang, Penglin [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
Wang, Junqiang [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Remote Sensing & Informat Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Land & Resources, Key Lab Urban Land Resources Monitoring & Simulat, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] China Special Equipment Inspection & Res Inst, Div Pressure Pipelines, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Technol Innovat Ctr Oil & Gas Pipeline & Storage, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Wetlands; classification; ensemble learning; artificial neural network; remote sensing; MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS; HIGH-SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; LAND-COVER; IMAGE-ANALYSIS; FUSION METHODS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RANDOM FOREST; SAR DATA; VEGETATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/15481603.2021.1932126
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Wetland cover classification grows out of the need for management and protection for wetland sources to depict wetland landscapes. Exploring improved classification methods is important to derive good-quality wetland mapping products. This study investigates and applies two artificial neural network (ANN) based ensemble methods, namely, the MultiBoost artificial neural network (MBANN) and the rotation artificial neural network (RANN), for wetland cover classification, taking the Zoige wetland sited in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China as the case area. The RANN trains and combines diverse ANNs by constructing a series of sparse rotation matrices, whereas the MBANN is developed from the sequential iteration in combination with the parallel sampling technique. Sixteen features related to wetland covers were extracted based on the digital elevation model data and Landsat 8 OLI images. The deep visual geometry group (VGG11) and random forests (RF) were implemented for comparison with our methods. The classification capability evaluation shows that our ensemble methods significantly improve the single ANN and outperform the VGG11 and RF. The RANN yields the highest overall accuracy (0.961), followed by the MBANN (0.942), VGG11 (0.934), RF (0.931), and ANN (0.916). We further concern and evaluate the classifier's robustness because it reflects the uniformity of classification capability. The RANN and the MBANN are insensitive to the reduction in data size, resistant to feature variability, and not influenced by data noise. Overall, the use of ensemble techniques can refine single ANN in classification capability and stability. The results from this study attest the important role of ensemble learning, which provides a promising scheme for wetland cover classification.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 623
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial neural network ensemble for land cover classification
    He, Lingmin
    Kong, Fansheng
    Shen, Zhangquan
    WCICA 2006: SIXTH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-12, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 623 - 623
  • [2] Forest Cover Classification Using Stacking of Ensemble Learning and Neural Networks
    Patil, Pruthviraj R.
    Sivagami, M.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATIONS IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2020, 1056 : 89 - 102
  • [3] Land Cover Classification Using Ensemble Techniques
    Parikh, Hemani, I
    Patel, Samir B.
    Patel, Vibha D.
    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, PREMI 2019, PT II, 2019, 11942 : 340 - 349
  • [4] Land cover classification from MODIS satellite data using probabilistically optimal ensemble of artificial neural networks
    Mackin, Kenneth J.
    Nunohiro, Eiji
    Ohshiro, Masanori
    Yamasaki, Kazuko
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PT 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4253 : 820 - 826
  • [5] Improving Foraminifera Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Ensemble Learning
    Nanni, Loris
    Faldani, Giovanni
    Brahnam, Sheryl
    Bravin, Riccardo
    Feltrin, Elia
    SIGNALS, 2023, 4 (03): : 524 - 538
  • [6] Improving land-cover classification using recognition threshold neural networks
    Aitkenhead, M. J.
    Dyer, R.
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2007, 73 (04): : 413 - 421
  • [7] AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION USING IMAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
    Karacor, Adil Gursel
    Torun, Erdal
    Abay, Rasit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 25 (08) : 1321 - 1335
  • [8] The use of backpropagating artificial neural networks in land cover classification
    Kavzoglu, T
    Mather, PM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 24 (23) : 4907 - 4938
  • [9] ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS FOR LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION AND MAPPING
    CIVCO, DL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1993, 7 (02): : 173 - 186
  • [10] Wetland Restoration Prioritization Using Artificial Neural Networks
    Maleki, Saeideh
    Soffianian, Ali Reza
    Koupaei, Saeid Soltani
    Baghdadi, Nicolas
    EL-Hajj, Mohamad
    Sheikholeslam, Farid
    Pourmanafi, Saeid
    WETLANDS, 2020, 40 (01) : 179 - 192