Bitcoin Return Volatility Forecasting: A Comparative Study between GARCH and RNN

被引:14
|
作者
Shen, Ze [1 ]
Wan, Qing [2 ]
Leatham, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Agr Econ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
bitcoin; GARCH; machine learning; recurrent neural network; volatility; risk management; ABSOLUTE ERROR MAE; RMSE;
D O I
10.3390/jrfm14070337
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
One of the notable features of bitcoin is its extreme volatility. The modeling and forecasting of bitcoin volatility are crucial for bitcoin investors' decision-making analysis and risk management. However, most previous studies of bitcoin volatility were founded on econometric models. Research on bitcoin volatility forecasting using machine learning algorithms is still sparse. In this study, both conventional econometric models and a machine learning model are used to forecast the bitcoin's return volatility and Value at Risk. The objective of this study is to compare their out-of-sample performance in forecasting accuracy and risk management efficiency. The results demonstrate that the RNN outperforms GARCH and EWMA in average forecasting performance. However, it is less efficient in capturing the bitcoin market's extreme events. Moreover, the RNN shows poor performance in Value at Risk forecasting, indicating that it could not work well as the econometric models in explaining extreme volatility. This study proposes an alternative method of bitcoin volatility analysis and provides more motivation for economic researchers to apply machine learning methods to the less volatile financial market conditions. Meanwhile, it also shows that the machine learning approaches are not always more advanced than econometric models, contrary to common belief.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stacking hybrid GARCH models for forecasting Bitcoin volatility
    Aras, Serkan
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 174
  • [2] Modeling and Forecasting the Volatility of NIFTY 50 Using GARCH and RNN Models
    Mahajan, Vanshu
    Thakan, Sunil
    Malik, Aashish
    [J]. ECONOMIES, 2022, 10 (05)
  • [3] Forecasting Bitcoin Volatility Using Hybrid GARCH Models with Machine Learning
    Zahid, Mamoona
    Iqbal, Farhat
    Koutmos, Dimitrios
    [J]. RISKS, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [4] A Comparative Study Between Economic Models and Machine Learning Models for Bitcoin Return Volatility Prediction
    Wu, Haoran
    Zhou, Jiahe
    [J]. Proceedings - 2023 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Communication and Convergence, ICI3C 2023, 2023, : 18 - 24
  • [5] Forecasting Stock Return Volatility: A Comparison of GARCH, Implied Volatility, and Realized Volatility Models
    Kambouroudis, Dimos S.
    McMillan, David G.
    Tsakou, Katerina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2016, 36 (12) : 1127 - 1163
  • [6] Modelling and forecasting the volatility of bitcoin futures: the role of distributional assumption in GARCH models
    Gyamerah, Samuel Asante
    Abaitey, Collins
    [J]. DATA SCIENCE IN FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 2022, 2 (03): : 321 - 334
  • [7] Forecasting volatility of Bitcoin
    Bergsli, Lykke Overland
    Lind, Andrea Falk
    Molnar, Peter
    Polasik, Michal
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2022, 59
  • [8] Forecasting volatility of crude oil futures using a GARCH-RNN hybrid approach
    Verma, Sauraj
    [J]. INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ACCOUNTING FINANCE & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (02): : 130 - 142
  • [9] Volatility and return jumps in bitcoin
    Chaim, Pedro
    Laurini, Marcio P.
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 173 : 158 - 163
  • [10] The relationship between Bitcoin returns, volatility and volume: asymmetric GARCH modeling
    Sapuric, Svetlana
    Kokkinaki, Angelika
    Georgiou, Ifigenia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 35 (06) : 1506 - 1521