Conservative management of occult pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Smith, Jeremy Adam [1 ,2 ]
Secombe, Paul [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Aromataris, Edoardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, JBI, 55 King William Rd, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Alfred Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Alice Springs Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Alice Springs, NT, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Med, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Australian & New Zealand Intens Care Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
关键词
Occult pneumothorax; mechanical ventilation; conservative management; intercostal catheter; LUNG-PROTECTIVE VENTILATION; LOWER TIDAL VOLUMES; TUBE THORACOSTOMY; TRAUMATIC PNEUMOTHORAX; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BLUNT TRAUMA; CHEST TUBE; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; PIGTAIL CATHETER; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000003322
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of conservative management versus prophylactic intercostal catheter (ICC) insertion for the management of occult pneumothoraces in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and other trial registries were searched. Eligible studies were critically appraised using standardized instruments. Meta-analysis was performed with mixed-methods logistic regression where appropriate and sensitivity analyses were performed with alternative statistical methods (Stata (TM) 15 or RevMan 5.3) or summarized in narrative. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were analyzed separately. RESULTS Twelve studies with a total of 354 participants were included; three RCTs (178 participants) and nine cohort studies (176 participants). The majority of the included studies, particularly the cohort studies, were well conducted. Two of the RCTs were rated as low quality. Statistically significant differences were observed in the RCT analysis: ICC insertion (any reason) (odds ratio, 2.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-6.43, 2 RCTs) in favor of prophylactic ICC; ICC complications (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.62, 2 RCTs) in favor of conservative management. Nonstatistically significant differences were observed for progression of pneumothorax, ICC insertion (progression to simple pneumothorax), and ICC insertion (nonpneumothorax reasons). Results of analyses showed high imprecision (wide confidence limits). Conservative management showed a low rate of tension pneumothorax (2.8%). Complications were higher in the ICC group (19.5% vs. 5.8%). CONCLUSION Available evidence suggests that conservative management is safe for the management of occult pneumothoraces in mechanically ventilated patients, especially when undergoing short-term (<4 days) ventilation. We recommend that patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for a procedure alone and patients suspected to be ventilated less than 4 days can be conservatively managed.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1040
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reply to letter to the editor: Conservative management of occult pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Borazjani, Roham
    Sabetian, Golnar
    Shams, Amir Hossein
    Ahadi, Mahsa
    Paydar, Shahram
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2022, 92 (06): : E141 - E142
  • [2] Effectiveness and safety of conservative management of occult pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review protocol
    Smith, Jeremy A.
    Secombe, Paul
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (08) : 1751 - 1759
  • [3] Ketamine sedation in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Manasco, A. Travis
    Stephens, Robert J.
    Yaeger, Lauren H.
    Roberts, Brian W.
    Fuller, Brian M.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 56 : 80 - 88
  • [4] Efficacy of albumin with diuretics in mechanically ventilated patients with hypoalbuminemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Itagaki, Yuki
    Yoshida, Naofumi
    Banno, Masahiro
    Momosaki, Ryo
    Yamada, Kohei
    Hayakawa, Mineji
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (37) : E30276
  • [5] Awareness With Paralysis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Emergency Department and ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pappal, Ryan D.
    Roberts, Brian W.
    Winkler, Winston
    Yaegar, Lauren H.
    Stephens, Robert J.
    Fuller, Brian M.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (03) : E304 - E314
  • [6] Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on respiratory function in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiong, Xingyu
    Zhang, Dandan
    Cheng, Shouzhen
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [7] The effects of early mobilization in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Lijie
    Hua, Yusi
    Wang, Luping
    Zou, Xia
    Zhang, Yan
    Ou, Xiaofeng
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [8] The Effect of Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Agent for Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Caimu
    Chen, Qijiang
    Wang, Ping
    Jin, Weisheng
    Zhong, Chao
    Ge, Zisheng
    Xu, Kangmin
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [9] Utility and safety of draining pleural effusions in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Goligher, Ewan C.
    Leis, Jerome A.
    Fowler, Robert A.
    Pinto, Ruxandra
    Adhikari, Neill K. J.
    Ferguson, Niall D.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 15 (01)
  • [10] Early mobilization for mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit:a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meng Yue
    Zhan-Ying Ma
    Meng-Jie Lei
    Chu-Yun Cui
    Yi Jin
    Frontiers of Nursing, 2018, 5 (04) : 301 - 310