Analysis of Differencing and Decomposition prepossessing methods for wind speed prediction

被引:43
|
作者
Bokde, Neeraj [1 ]
Feijoo, Andres [2 ]
Kulat, Kishore [1 ]
机构
[1] Visvesvaraya Natl Inst Technol, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
[2] Univ Vigo, Dept Enxeneria Elect, Campus Lagoas Marcosende, Vigo 36310, Spain
关键词
Time series; Prediction; Wind speed; Renewable energy; Preprocessing; Hybrid models; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION; NEURAL-NETWORK; SPECTRUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2018.07.041
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Preprocessing methods improve prediction accuracy in a significant way. Generally, they stabilize data series mean and variance and remove irregularities. In this paper, two of these methods have been used and compared in the Pattern Sequence based Forecasting (PSF) algorithm. These preprocessing methods are based on differencing and decomposition principles. In the decomposition approach, the Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition-Pattern Sequence based Forecasting (EEMD-PSF) model is used. It decomposes the data into finite numbers of subseries and improves the performance of the PSF method. In the Difference Pattern Sequence based Forecasting (DPSF) method, the effects of trends, seasonality, and irregularity components are reduced to some extent and their consequences are tested on distinct datasets with different patterns. While comparing the effects of these preprocessing methods with the effect of the PSF method for sets of wind speed data collected in the autonomous region of Galicia, Spain, and National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), USA, in terms of prediction accuracy, both methods have performed better than the contemporary methods including single PSF, ARIMA, and LSSVM methods. In terms of computational time consumption, the DPSF method has outperformed the results of the EEMD-PSF model. The simulations revealed that the hybridization of preprocessing and PSF methods has significantly outperformed other state-of-the-art methods for short term wind speed prediction. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 938
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chaotic Analysis and Prediction of Wind Speed Based on Wavelet Decomposition
    Lin, Li
    Xia, Dandan
    Dai, Liming
    Zheng, Qingsong
    Qin, Zhiqin
    PROCESSES, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [2] Prediction of typhoon design wind speed with cholesky decomposition method
    Huang, W. F.
    Sun, J. P.
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2018, 27 (11):
  • [3] Improved Wind Speed Prediction Using Empirical Mode Decomposition
    Zhang, Yagang
    Zhang, Chenhong
    Sun, Jingbin
    Guo, Jingjing
    ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, 2018, 18 (02) : 3 - 10
  • [4] Validation of wind speed prediction methods at offshore sites
    McQueen, D
    Watson, S
    WIND ENERGY, 2006, 9 (1-2) : 75 - 85
  • [5] Assessment of gust factors and wind speed decomposition methods for thunderstorms
    Zhao, Shiyu
    Ge, Yaojun
    Kopp, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2022, 223
  • [6] Assessment of gust factors and wind speed decomposition methods for thunderstorms
    Zhao, Shiyu
    Ge, Yaojun
    Kopp, Gregory
    Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 223
  • [7] A Review on Hybrid Empirical Mode Decomposition Models for Wind Speed and Wind Power Prediction
    Bokde, Neeraj
    Feijoo, Andres
    Villanueva, Daniel
    Kulat, Kishore
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (02):
  • [8] The Intelligent Methods Used in Prediction the Wind Speed and Output Power of Wind Farm
    Zhang, Xinyan
    Chen Chongchong
    Wang, Weiqing
    Dai, Yi
    2012 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2012,
  • [9] Empirical mode decomposition and chaos based prediction model for wind speed oscillations
    Drisya, G. V.
    Kumar, K. Satheesh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 IEEE RECENT ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS (RAICS), 2015, : 306 - 311
  • [10] Wind Speed Prediction Using Wavelet Decomposition Based on Lorenz Disturbance Model
    Zhang, Yagang
    Zhang, Chenhong
    Gao, Shuang
    Wang, Penghui
    Xie, Fenglin
    Cheng, Penglai
    Lei, Shuang
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2020, 66 (05) : 635 - 642