Choice and stimulus-response compatibility affect duration of response selection

被引:31
|
作者
Dassonville, P
Lewis, SM
Foster, HE
Ashe, J
机构
[1] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Brain Sci Ctr 11B, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 1999年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
motor control; stimulus-response compatibility; choice; mental rotation; symbolic cue; spatial cue;
D O I
10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00027-5
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In general, for movements to visual targets, response times increase with the number of possible response choices. However, this rule only seems to hold when an incompatibility exists between the stimulus and response, and is absent when stimulus and response are highly compatible (e.g., when reaching toward the location of the stimulus). Stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility can be manipulated either at the level of stimulus and response characteristics, or at the level of the mapping between elements of the stimulus and response sets. The current study was undertaken to determine the extent of the interaction between choice and each of these two levels of S-R compatibility. Subjects used a joystick to move a cursor in response to two, four or eight possible cues, with S-R compatibility manipulated along two dimensions (type of stimulus, and mapping between stimulus and response sets) in separate blocks of trials. Choice effects were absent when S-R relationships were highly compatible, moderate when incompatible in either of the two dimensions, and greatest when incompatible in both dimensions. These results indicate that choice affects response selection at each stage in the decoding of S-R relationships. Similar but smaller effects were seen for trials in which the stimulus was the same as that presented in the immediately preceding trial, suggesting that repeated stimulus-response transformations are faster and more efficient due to the priming effects of previous trials. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 240
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition
    Verbruggen, F
    Liefooghe, B
    Notebaert, W
    Vandierendonck, A
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2005, 120 (03) : 307 - 326
  • [2] Temporal stimulus-response compatibility
    Grosjean, M
    Mordkoff, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 27 (04) : 870 - 878
  • [3] Compatibility in Stimulus-Response Coupling
    Weeks, D. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 : S3 - S3
  • [4] Proprioception and stimulus-response compatibility
    Worringham, CJ
    Kerr, GK
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 53 (01): : 69 - 83
  • [5] STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY EFFECTS IN CHOICE REACTIONS AND MEMORY SCANNING
    OGDEN, GD
    ALLUISI, EA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1980, 6 (04): : 430 - 438
  • [6] RESPONSE CHOICE IN PARKINSONS-DISEASE - THE EFFECTS OF UNCERTAINTY AND STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY
    BROWN, RG
    JAHANSHAHI, M
    MARSDEN, D
    [J]. BRAIN, 1993, 116 : 869 - 885
  • [7] Stimulus-set location does not affect orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility
    Yang Seok Cho
    Robert W. Proctor
    [J]. Psychological Research, 2004, 69 : 106 - 114
  • [8] Stimulus-set location does not affect orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility
    Cho, YS
    Proctor, RW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2004, 69 (1-2): : 106 - 114
  • [9] Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection
    Mei-Ching Lien
    Robert W. Proctor
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2002, 9 : 212 - 238
  • [10] Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection
    Lien, MC
    Proctor, RW
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2002, 9 (02) : 212 - 238