Risk Measures in a Multi-stage Stochastic Supply Chain Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Zeballos, Luis J. [1 ]
Mendez, Carlos A. [1 ]
Barbosa-Povoa, Ana P. [2 ]
机构
[1] UNL CONICET, INTEC, Santa Fe, Argentina
[2] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Ctr Management Studies, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Mathematical modeling; robust stochastic approach; risk measures; design and planning; closed-loop supply chain; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; SCENARIO REDUCTION; LOGISTICS NETWORK; DESIGN; UNCERTAINTY; DEMAND; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper considers the optimal design and planning problem of a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) where profit maximization is pursued while considering: adjustments in the network structure during the planning horizon providing flexibility to the network as well as uncertainty in supply and customer demands. A multi-stage stochastic framework is developed where the effects of the uncertainty are represented by means of discrete scenarios. With the objective of achieving more robust solutions, besides the expected profit, three other risk adverse objective functions are also considered: two based on the mean absolute deviation and another centered on the conditional value at risk (CVaR) concept. In contrast to other approaches, in this work the definition of CVaR is applied to both revenues and costs. The proposed framework is evaluated by means of several cases. The advantages of using risk adverse performance measures are explored. Thus, the characteristics of the solutions obtained with the stochastic approach considering the variability of the solutions are compared with the features of the solution obtained considering a risk neutral performance measure. Finally, a sensitivity study of the parameters associated with the objective function centered on the conditional value at risk concept is conducted.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 529
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-stage stochastic programming approach for blood supply chain planning
    Zahiri, B.
    Torabi, S. Ali
    Moharnmadi, M.
    Aghabegloo, M.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 122 : 1 - 14
  • [2] A multi-stage stochastic programming approach for supply chain risk mitigation via product substitution
    Khalilabadi, Seyed Mahdi Ghorashi
    Zegordi, Seyed Hessameddin
    Nikbakhsh, Ehsan
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 149
  • [3] Supply chain planning using multi-stage stochastic programming
    Nagar, Lokesh
    Jain, Karuna
    [J]. SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2008, 13 (03) : 251 - 256
  • [4] The impact of transshipment on an integrated platelet supply chain: A multi-stage stochastic programming approach
    Xu, Yuan
    Szmerekovsky, Joseph
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 176
  • [5] A Multi-site Supply Chain Planning Using Multi-stage Stochastic Programming
    Felfel, Houssem
    Ayadi, Omar
    Masmoudi, Faouzi
    [J]. MULTIPHYSICS MODELLING AND SIMULATION FOR SYSTEMS DESIGN AND MONITORING, 2015, 2 : 289 - 298
  • [6] Ordering Control in Multi-Stage Multi-Item Supply Chain with Stochastic Demand
    Li, Liuxi
    Song, Shiji
    Wu, Cheng
    You, Keyou
    [J]. 2017 13TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL & AUTOMATION (ICCA), 2017, : 707 - 712
  • [7] A stochastic network model for ordering analysis in multi-stage supply chain systems
    Li, Chong
    Liu, Sifeng
    [J]. SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2012, 22 : 92 - 108
  • [8] Optimizing inventory decisions in a multi-stage supply chain under stochastic demands
    Seliaman, M. E.
    Ahmad, Ab Rahman
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 206 (02) : 538 - 542
  • [9] Multi-Stage Supply Chain with Production Uncertainty
    Feng, Qi
    Ma, Zhongjie
    Mao, Zhaofang
    Shanthikumar, J. George
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 30 (04) : 921 - 940
  • [10] Multi-stage stochastic optimization of the design and planning of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain
    Zeballos, Luis J.
    Mendez, Carlos A.
    Barbosa-Povoa, Ana P.
    Novais, Augusto Q.
    [J]. 23 EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2013, 32 : 691 - 696