A Comparison amongst Face-to-Face, Blended, and Mostly Online Course Options

被引：0

作者：

McMahon, Russell ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Educ Criminal Justice & Human Serv, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA

来源：

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION (SIGITE'17) | 2017年

关键词：

face-2-face teaching; blended teaching; online teaching;

D O I：

10.1145/3125659.3125663

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

This talk is based upon the author's observations in 4-secitons of a freshman database 1 course over a two-year period in which students were given the option of attending nearly every class, taking a blended version of the course, or taking it partially online. Attendance was kept for all classes and a comparison of the final grades were tabulated. Later, statistics were gathered on what format of class (online or face-to-face) students took for their second database course. This study only looks at Information Technology majors. This talk is designed to elicit discussion from the audience.

引用

页码：71 / 71

页数：1

共 50 条

[1] A Comparison amongst Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Partially Online Course Involving a Freshman Database Course
McMahon, Russell
[J]. SIGITE'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2016, : 174 - 174
[2] A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments
Dziuban, Charles
Moskal, Patsy
[J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 14 (04): : 236 - 241
[3] How to Decide the Proportion of Online to Face-to-Face Components of a Blended Course? A Delphi Study
Alammary, Ali Saleh
[J]. SAGE OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
[4] Are Undergraduate Students Ready for Online Learning ? A Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Sections of a Course
Keramidas, Cathy Galyon
[J]. RURAL SPECIAL EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2012, 31 (04) : 25 - 32
[5] Comparison of student attitudes and performance in an online and a face-to-face inorganic chemistry course
Nennig, Hannah T.
Idarraga, Katrina L.
Salzer, Luke D.
Bleske-Rechek, April
Theisen, Roslyn M.
[J]. CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (01) : 168 - 177
[6] A Comparative Study of an Online and a Face-to-Face Chemistry Course
Gulacar, Ozcan
Damkaci, Fehmi
Bowman, Charles R.
[J]. JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE ONLINE LEARNING, 2013, 12 (01): : 27 - 40
[7] Identifying criteria that should be considered when deciding the proportion of online to face-to-face components of a blended course
Alammary, Ali
Carbone, Angela
Sheard, Judy
[J]. 2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, : 72 - 80
[8] Determining the differences between online and face-to-face student-group interactions in a blended learning course
Shu, Hang
Gu, Xiaoqing
[J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 39 : 13 - 21
[9] Seamless Integration Between Online and Face-to-Face: The Design and Perception of a Flipped-Blended Language Course
Zhang, Shenglan
Cherrez, Nadia Jaramillo
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING, 2021, 11 (04) : 19 - 39
[10] COMPARISON OF NOVICE PROGRAMMERS' PERFORMANCES: Blended Versus Face-To-Face
Cakiroglu, Unal
[J]. TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2012, 13 (03): : 135 - 151

← 1 2 3 4 5 →