Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis

被引:215
|
作者
Braglia, M
Frosolini, M
Montanari, R
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Fac Ingn, Dipartimento Ingn Meccan Nucl & Prod, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Parma, Dipartimento Ingn Ind, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
FMECA; criticality analysis; fuzzy logic; multi-attribute decision analysis;
D O I
10.1002/qre.528
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, an alternative multi-attribute decision-making approach for prioritizing failures in failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) is presented. The technique is specifically intended to overcome some of the limitations concerning the use of the conventional US MIL-STD-1629A method. The approach is based on a fuzzy version of the 'technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution' (TOPSIS). The use of fuzzy logic theory allows one to avoid the intrinsic difficulty encountered in assessing 'crisp' values in terms of the three FMECA parameters, namely chance of failure, chance of non-detection, and severity. With the proposed approach, the definition of a knowledge base supported by several qualitative rule bases is no longer required. To solve the fundamental question of ranking the final fuzzy criticality value, a particular method of classification is adopted, allowing a fast and efficient sorting of the final outcome. An application to an important Italian domestic appliance manufacturer and a comparison with conventional FMECA are reported to demonstrate the characteristics of the proposed method. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of the fuzzy judgement weights has confirmed that the proposed approach gives a reasonable and robust final priority ranking of the different causes of failure. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 443
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid TOPSIS approach
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    You, Jian-Xin
    Shan, Meng-Meng
    Shao, Lu-Ning
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 19 (04) : 1085 - 1098
  • [2] Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid TOPSIS approach
    Hu-Chen Liu
    Jian-Xin You
    Meng-Meng Shan
    Lu-Ning Shao
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2015, 19 : 1085 - 1098
  • [3] Criticality Assessment Models for Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis Using Fuzzy Logic
    Gargama, Heeralal
    Chaturvedi, Sanjay Kumar
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2011, 60 (01) : 102 - 110
  • [4] A UNIFIED APPROACH TO FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS (FMECA)
    WEI, BC
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 1991, (SYM): : 260 - 271
  • [5] A rough TOPSIS Approach for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Uncertain Environments
    Song, Wenyan
    Ming, Xinguo
    Wu, Zhenyong
    Zhu, Baoting
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 30 (04) : 473 - 486
  • [6] FUZZY-LOGIC PRIORITIZATION OF FAILURES IN A SYSTEM FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS
    BOWLES, JB
    PELAEZ, CE
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 50 (02) : 203 - 213
  • [7] Failure mode, effects and criticality analysis improvement by using new criticality assessment and prioritization based approach
    Chakhrit, Ammar
    Chennoufi, Mohammed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 21 (05) : 1545 - 1567
  • [8] A practical approach to failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) for computing systems
    Becker, JC
    Flick, G
    [J]. IEEE HIGH-ASSURANCE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING WORKSHOP, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 228 - 236
  • [9] Failure Modes and Effects Analysis based on Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Zhang, Fenglin
    Zhang, Wenjun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREY SYSTEMS AND INTELLIGENT SERVICES (GSIS), 2015, : 588 - 593
  • [10] A Novel Approach to Support Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Based on Complex Networks
    Wang, Lixiang
    Dai, Wei
    Luo, Guixiu
    Zhao, Yu
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2019, 21 (12)