Reasoning support for risk prediction and prevention in independent living

被引:6
|
作者
Mileo, A. [1 ]
Merico, D. [1 ]
Bisiani, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, NOMADIS Res Lab, Dept Informat Syst & Commun, I-20126 Milan, Italy
关键词
answer set programming; wireless sensor networks; independent living; prediction; context-awareness; knowledge representation; dependency graph; PEOPLE; SYSTEM; FALLS;
D O I
10.1017/S147106841000058X
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In recent years there has been a growing interest in solutions for the delivery of clinical care for the elderly because of the large increase in aging population. Monitoring a patient in his home environment is necessary to ensure continuity of care in home settings, but, to be useful, this activity must not be too invasive for patients and a burden for caregivers. We prototyped a system called Secure and IN Dependent lIving (SINDI), focused on (a) collecting a limited amount of data about the person and the environment through Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN), and (b) inferring from these data enough information to support caregivers in understanding patients' well-being and in predicting possible evolutions of their health. Our hierarchical logic-based model of health combines data from different sources, sensor data, tests results, common-sense knowledge and patient's clinical profile at the lower level, and correlation rules between health conditions across upper levels. The logical formalization and the reasoning process are based on Answer Set Programming. The expressive power of this logic programming paradigm makes it possible to reason about health evolution even when the available information is incomplete and potentially incoherent, while declarativity simplifies rules specification by caregivers and allows automatic encoding of knowledge. This paper describes how these issues have been targeted in the application scenario of the SINDI system.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 395
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TEC to support independent living
    Dix, Carla
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22
  • [2] FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE SUPPORT FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING
    ALLEN, M
    BONNER, K
    GREENAN, L
    CHILD WELFARE, 1988, 67 (06) : 515 - 527
  • [3] ENVIRONMENT AS A SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING
    LIFCHEZ, R
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1979, 60 (10): : 467 - 476
  • [4] Prevention risk prediction
    Seton-Rogers S.
    Nature Reviews Cancer, 2013, 13 (9) : 609 - 609
  • [5] Activity monitoring to support independent living in Dutch homecare support
    Willems, Charles G.
    Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D.
    van der Heide, Loek
    Glascock, Anthony P.
    Kutzik, David L.
    de Witte, Luc
    Rietman, John
    EVERYDAY TECHNOLOGY FOR INDEPENDENCE AND CARE, 2011, 29 : 145 - 151
  • [6] Towards support: evaluating a move to independent living
    Karban, Kate
    Paley, Caroline
    Willcock, Kim
    HOUSING CARE AND SUPPORT, 2013, 16 (02) : 85 - 94
  • [7] The Challenges behind Independent Living Support Systems
    Bella, Giampaolo
    Jaeppinen, Pekka
    Laakkonen, Jussi
    ACTIVE MEDIA TECHNOLOGY, AMT 2014, 2014, 8610 : 464 - +
  • [8] A NEW APPROACH FOR PERSONALIZED FALL RISK PREDICTION & PREVENTION: TAILORED EXERCISES, UNOBTRUSIVE SENSING & ADVANCED REASONING
    Wieching, Rainer
    Kaartinen, Nico
    DeRosario, Helios
    Baldus, Heribert
    Eichberg, Sabine
    Drobics, Mario
    Delbaere, Kim
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2012, 20 : S120 - S120
  • [9] Counterfactual Reasoning for Fair Clinical Risk Prediction
    Pfohl, Stephen R.
    Duan, Tony
    Ding, Daisy Yi
    Shah, Nigam H.
    MACHINE LEARNING FOR HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE, VOL 106, 2019, 106
  • [10] Prevention and prediction of inhibitor risk
    Astermark, J.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2012, 18 : 38 - 42