共 50 条
Marijuana use in the context of alcohol interventions for mandated college students
被引:19
|作者:
Yurasek, Ali M.
[1
]
Merrill, Jennifer E.
[2
]
Metrik, Jane
[2
,3
]
Miller, Mary Beth
[2
]
Fernandez, Anne C.
[4
]
Borsari, Brian
[5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Hlth & Human Performance, Dept Hlth Educ & Behav, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Ctr Alcohol & Addict Studies, Sch Publ Hlth, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[3] Providence Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Providence, RI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
Motivational interventions;
Alcohol;
Marijuana;
Stepped-care;
BRIEF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVENTIONS;
NATIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGIC SURVEY;
SUBSTANCE-USE INTERVENTIONS;
SMOKING-CESSATION;
USE DISORDERS;
DRINKERS;
RISK;
COMORBIDITY;
VALIDATION;
PREDICTORS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.015
中图分类号:
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号:
040203 ;
摘要:
Objective: Concurrent use of marijuana and alcohol among college students is highly prevalent and associated with negative consequences. It remains unclear whether marijuana use is influenced by or lessens the efficacy of alcohol interventions delivered within a stepped-care approach. Method: Participants were 530 college students who violated campus alcohol policy and were mandated to an alcohol-focused brief advice (BA) session. Participants who reported continued risky alcohol use (4+ heavy drinking episodes and/or 5+ alcohol-related consequences in the past month) six weeks following the BA session were randomized to a brief motivational intervention (BMI; n = 211) or assessment only (AO; n = 194) condition. Follow-up assessments were conducted 3, 6, and 9 months' post-intervention. Results: Multiple regression analyses revealed that marijuana user status did not influence drinking outcomes following the BA session. However, hierarchical linear models suggested that marijuana users who were randomized to BMI or AO reported higher levels of binge drinking, pBAC and consequences compared to non-users, regardless of condition. Despite this, heavy drinking marijuana users and nonusers had equivalent reductions on alcohol use outcomes following the BMI sessions. Marijuana users who received a BMI did not significantly reduce marijuana use frequency compared to participants in the AO group. Conclusion: Use of marijuana did not lessen the efficacy of the BA session on alcohol use or consequences. Findings suggest that marijuana users respond similarly to alcohol interventions as do non-users and can benefit from brief or more intensive alcohol interventions. A marijuana-focused intervention may be warranted to facilitate changes in marijuana use. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 60
页数:8
相关论文