Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival

被引:348
|
作者
Fabbri, R [1 ]
Porcu, E
Marsella, T
Rocchetta, G
Venturoli, S
Flamigni, C
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Inst Obstet & Gynecol, Human Reprod Med Unit, IVF Ctr, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Biol, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
关键词
cryoprotectants; exposure time; human oocyte cryopreservation; oocyte survival; sucrose concentration;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/16.3.411
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The success of human oocyte cryopreservation depends on morphological and biophysical factors that could influence oocyte survival after thawing, Various attempts to cryopreserve human oocytes have been performed with contrasting results, Therefore the effect of some factors, such as the presence or absence of the cumulus oophorus, the sucrose concentration in the freezing solution and the exposure time to cryoprotectants, on human oocyte survival after thawing were investigated, The oocytes were cryopreserved in 1,2-propanediol added with sucrose, using a slow-freezing-rapid-thawing programme. After thawing, the oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and the outcomes of insemination and subsequent embryo development were also recorded, The post-thaw cryosurvival rate was not different for the oocytes cryopreserved with their cumuli partially removed mechanically (56%) when compared with those cryopreserved with their cumuli totally removed enzymatically (53%), On the contrary, a significantly higher survival rate was obtained when the oocytes were cryopreserved in the presence of a doubled sucrose concentration (0.2 mol/l) in the freezing solution and the survival rate was even higher when the sucrose concentration was tripled (0.3 mol/l) (60 versus 82% P < 0.001). Furthermore, a longer exposure time (from 10.5 to 15 min) to cryoprotectants, before lowering the temperature, significantly increased the oocyte survival rate (P < 0.005). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection produced a good fertilization rate (57%) of thawed oocytes and a high embryo cleavage rate (91%) and a satisfactory embryo morphology was observed (14 and 34% for grade I and grade II embryos respectively).
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 416
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oocyte cryopreservation: Oocyte assessment and strategies for improving survival
    Ledda, Sergio
    Bogliolo, Luisa
    Succu, Sara
    Ariu, Federica
    Bebbere, Daniela
    Leoni, Giovanni Giuseppe
    Naitana, Salvatore
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 19 (01) : 13 - 23
  • [2] Human oocyte cryopreservation
    Tao, Tao
    Zhang, Wenling
    Del Valle, Alfonso
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 21 (03) : 247 - 252
  • [3] Human oocyte cryopreservation
    Salha, O
    Picton, H
    Balen, A
    Rutherford, A
    HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2001, 62 (01): : 18 - 24
  • [4] Human oocyte cryopreservation
    Gook, Debra A.
    Edgar, David H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2007, 13 (06) : 591 - 605
  • [5] Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation
    Zachary Walker
    Andrea Lanes
    Elizabeth Ginsburg
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 20
  • [6] Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation
    Walker, Zachary
    Lanes, Andrea
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [7] HUMAN OOCYTE AND EMBRYO CRYOPRESERVATION
    ALIKANI, M
    COHEN, J
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 2 (05) : 714 - 717
  • [8] The dawning of a new ice age for human oocyte cryopreservation
    David F. Albertini
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2011, 28 : 1141 - 1142
  • [9] The dawning of a new ice age for human oocyte cryopreservation
    Albertini, David F.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2011, 28 (12) : 1141 - 1142
  • [10] Cryopreservation of the Bovine Oocyte: Current Status and Perspectives
    Diez, C.
    Munoz, M.
    Caamano, J. N.
    Gomez, E.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2012, 47 : 76 - 83