Improving estimation of pore size distribution to predict the soil water retention curve from its particle size distribution

被引:26
|
作者
Chang, Chen-chao [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Dong-hui [1 ,2 ]
Qiao, Xiao-ying [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Changan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Subsurface Hydrol & Ecol Effects Arid Reg, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Residual pore fraction; Clay fraction; Water content; Suction head; LIQUID RETENTION; POROUS-MEDIA; MODEL; CONDENSATION; SATURATION; EQUATION; SANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.011
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Traditional models employed to predict the soil water retention curve (SWRC) from the particle size distribution (PSD) always underestimate the water contents when the suction head is relative high. Using the measured physical parameters of 50 soil samples from the UNSODA unsaturated soil hydraulic property database, it is proven that this error originates from the poor conversion of the PSD to the pore size distribution (PoSD). The present study proposes a new approach to obtain a PoSD from a PSD, then to estimate the SWRCs. The residual pore fraction (the pore fraction with respect to clay content) was calculated using a power function, while the pore fractions of other sizes could readily be obtained using the corresponding particle mass fractions. The model was tested on 61 soils, and the results illustrated that the predicted PoSD from PSD using improved method exhibit good agreements with the measured PoSD, and the predicted SWRCs, which reduced the prediction bias at the relative high suction heads, reasonably approximated the measured SWRCs. Meanwhile, we evaluated the model performance through comparisons with the improved model proposed by Meskini-Vishkaee et al. (the scaled MV-VG model) and a traditional method, the results showed that the improved method provided better predictions of the SWRCs.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 212
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determining Capillary Pore-Size Distribution of Soil from Soil-Water Retention Curve
    Luo, Shengmin
    Zhou, Baochun
    Likos, William J.
    Lu, Ning
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 150 (02)
  • [2] A simplified directly determination of soil-water retention curve from pore size distribution
    Niu, Geng
    Shao, Longtan
    Sun, De'an
    Guo, Xiaoxia
    GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 20 (05) : 411 - 420
  • [3] Prediction of Water Retention Curve of a Layer Packed with Soil Particles from Particle Size Distribution
    Takahashi, Nobuhide
    Tsurukawa, Masataka
    Arai, Chikao
    Fukunaga, Hiroshi
    Yamada, Koichi
    KAGAKU KOGAKU RONBUNSHU, 2012, 38 (05) : 305 - 311
  • [4] Determination of the soil water retention curve and the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from the particle size distribution
    Scheuermann, Alexander
    Bieberstein, Andreas
    EXPERIMENTAL UNSATURATED SOIL MECHANICS, 2007, 112 : 421 - +
  • [5] Estimating soil water retention function from its particle-size distribution
    Tae-Kyu Lee
    Hee-Myong Ro
    Geosciences Journal, 2014, 18 : 219 - 230
  • [6] Estimating soil water retention function from its particle-size distribution
    Lee, Tae-Kyu
    Ro, Hee-Myong
    GEOSCIENCES JOURNAL, 2014, 18 (02) : 219 - 230
  • [7] Models of the water retention curve for soils with a fractal pore size distribution
    Perrier, E
    Rieu, M
    Sposito, G
    deMarsily, G
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1996, 32 (10) : 3025 - 3031
  • [8] Estimation of Soil-Water Retention From Particle-Size Distribution: Fractal Approaches
    Ghanbarian-Alavijeh, Behzad
    Hunt, Allen G.
    SOIL SCIENCE, 2012, 177 (05) : 321 - 326
  • [9] Inverse laplace transform to fit soil water retention curve and estimate the pore size distribution
    Cardinali, Marcelo Camponez do Brasil
    Miranda, Jarbas Honorio
    Moraes, Tiago Bueno
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2024, 244
  • [10] Evaluation of different representations of the particle-size distribution to predict soil water retention
    Nemes, A
    Rawls, WJ
    GEODERMA, 2006, 132 (1-2) : 47 - 58