Nonoperative versus Operative Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit: A Meta-analysis

被引:124
|
作者
Gnanenthiran, Sonali R. [1 ,2 ]
Adie, Sam [1 ,2 ]
Harris, Ian A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, S W Sydney Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Liverpool Hosp, Whitlam Orthopaed Res Ctr, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
关键词
POSTERIOR FIXATION; SPINE FRACTURES; LUMBAR SPINE; MANAGEMENT; CLASSIFICATION; INSTRUMENTATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-011-2157-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Decision-making regarding nonoperative versus operative treatment of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficits is controversial. Lack of evidence-based practice may result in patients being treated inappropriately and being exposed to unnecessary adverse consequences. Using meta-analysis, we therefore compared pain (VAS) and function (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit treated nonoperatively and operatively. Secondary outcomes included return to work, radiographic progression of kyphosis, radiographic progression of spinal canal stenosis, complications, cost, and length of hospitalization. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE(A (R)), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for 'thoracic fractures', 'lumbar fractures', 'non-operative', 'operative' and 'controlled clinical trials'. We established five criteria for inclusion. Data extraction and quality assessment were in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The main analyses were performed on individual patient data from randomized controlled trials. Sensitivity analyses were performed on VAS pain, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score, kyphosis, and return to work, including data from nonrandomized controlled trials and using fixed effects meta-analysis. We identified four trials, including two randomized controlled trials consisting of 79 patients (41 with operative treatment and 38 with nonoperative treatment). The mean followups ranged from 24 to 118 months. We found no between-group differences in baseline pain, kyphosis, and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire scores. At last followup, there were no between-group differences in pain, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire scores, and return to work rates. We found an improvement in kyphosis ranging from means of 12.8A(0) to 11A(0) in the operative group, but surgery was associated with higher complication rates and costs. Operative management of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit may improve residual kyphosis, but does not appear to improve pain or function at an average of 4 years after injury and is associated with higher complication rates and costs. Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 577
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit: A Meta- Analysis
    Pieler-Bruha, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL FUR MINERALSTOFFWECHSEL, 2012, 19 (01): : 50 - 51
  • [2] Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit
    Shen, WJ
    Liu, TJ
    Shen, YS
    [J]. SPINE, 2001, 26 (09) : 1038 - 1045
  • [3] ACUTE THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES IN THE ABSENCE OF NEUROLOGIC DEFICIT - A COMPARISON BETWEEN OPERATIVE AND NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT
    DENIS, F
    ARMSTRONG, GWD
    SEARLS, K
    MATTA, L
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1984, (189) : 142 - 149
  • [4] Operative versus non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit
    Yi L
    Jingping B
    Gele J
    Baoleri X
    Taixiang W
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04):
  • [5] Comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients without neurological deficit: a systematic review
    Thomas, KC
    Bailey, CS
    Dvorak, MF
    Kwon, B
    Fisher, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 4 (05) : 351 - 358
  • [6] Operative Compared with Nonoperative Treatment of a Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture without Neurological Deficit
    Wood, Kirkham B.
    Buttermann, Glenn R.
    Phukan, Rishabh
    Harrod, Christopher C.
    Mehbod, Amir
    Shannon, Brian
    Bono, Christopher M.
    Harris, Mitchel B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (01): : 3 - 9
  • [7] Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit
    Verlaan, JJ
    Oner, FC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (03): : 649 - 650
  • [8] Conservative or operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit?
    Aviles, Carolina
    Flores, Sebastian
    Molina, Marcelo
    [J]. MEDWAVE, 2016, 16 : e6383
  • [9] Percutaneous versus traditional and paraspinal posterior open approaches for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic deficit: a meta-analysis
    Xiang-Yao Sun
    Xi-Nuo Zhang
    Yong Hai
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 1418 - 1431
  • [10] Percutaneous versus traditional and paraspinal posterior open approaches for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic deficit: a meta-analysis
    Sun, Xiang-Yao
    Zhang, Xi-Nuo
    Hai, Yong
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (05) : 1418 - 1431