A comparison of deterministic and stochastic approaches for sensitivity analysis in computational systems biology

被引:11
|
作者
Simoni, Giulia [1 ,2 ]
Hong Thanh Vo [3 ]
Priami, Corrado [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Marchetti, Luca [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trento, Microsoft Res, Ctr Computat & Syst Biol COSBI, Piazza Manifattura 1, I-38068 Rovereto, TN, Italy
[2] Univ Trento, Math, Rovereto, TN, Italy
[3] Aalto Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Espoo, Finland
[4] Univ Pisa, Comp Sci, Pisa, Italy
[5] Stanford SPARK Global Initiat, Pisa Node, Pisa, Italy
[6] COSBI, Rovereto, TN, Italy
[7] COSBI, Computat Biol Team, Rovereto, TN, Italy
[8] Univ Verona, Verona, Italy
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
sensitivity analysis; deterministic simulation; stochastic simulation; mathematical modeling; computational biology; systems biology; PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES; GRADIENT ESTIMATION; CHEMICAL-SYSTEMS; SIMULATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1093/bib/bbz014
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
With the recent rising application of mathematical models in the field of computational systems biology, the interest in sensitivity analysis methods had increased. The stochastic approach, based on chemical master equations, and the deterministic approach, based on ordinary differential equations (ODEs), are the two main approaches for analyzing mathematical models of biochemical systems. In this work, the performance of these approaches to compute sensitivity coefficients is explored in situations where stochastic and deterministic simulation can potentially provide different results (systems with unstable steady states, oscillators with population extinction and bistable systems). We consider two methods in the deterministic approach, namely the direct differential method and the finite difference method, and five methods in the stochastic approach, namely the Girsanov transformation, the independent random number method, the common random number method, the coupled finite difference method and the rejection-based finite difference method. The reviewed methods are compared in terms of sensitivity values and computational time to identify differences in outcome that can highlight conditions in which one approach performs better than the other.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 540
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON BETWEEN STOCHASTIC AND DETERMINISTIC APPROACHES IN SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS
    Priceputu, Adrian
    Bugea, Adrian Liviu
    Anghel, Alexandra
    Serbulea, Monole Stelian
    [J]. GEOCONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGIES IN GEOLOGY, EXPLORATION AND MINING, SGEM 2013, VOL II, 2013, : 41 - 48
  • [2] Comparison of Deterministic, Stochastic, and Mixed Approaches to Cryptocurrency Dynamics Analysis
    Dostov, Victor
    Pimenov, Pavel
    Shoust, Pavel
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, ICCSA 2021, PT IV, 2021, 12952 : 19 - 30
  • [3] Stochastic approaches in systems biology
    Ullah, Mukhtar
    Wolkenhauer, Olaf
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (04) : 385 - 397
  • [4] Computational approaches to reachability analysis of stochastic hybrid systems
    Abate, Alessandro
    Amin, Saurabh
    Prandini, Maria
    Lygeros, John
    Sastry, Shankar
    [J]. HYBRID SYSTEMS: COMPUTATION AND CONTROL, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4416 : 4 - +
  • [5] Sensitivity analysis approaches applied to systems biology models
    Zi, Z.
    [J]. IET SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2011, 5 (06) : 336 - 346
  • [6] DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC APPROACHES IN SEISMOGRAM ANALYSIS
    AKI, K
    [J]. OBSERVATORY SEISMOLOGY, 1989, : 257 - 265
  • [7] Comparison of Deterministic and Stochastic Approaches for Calcium Dependent Exocytosis
    Matveev, Victor
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 114 (03) : 283A - 284A
  • [8] Computational Approaches to Systems Biology: Multiple Approaches to Clostridium Acetobutylicum
    Hurley, Margaret
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 104 (02) : 496A - 496A
  • [9] A Comparison of Deterministic and Stochastic Modeling Approaches for Biochemical Reaction Systems: On Fixed Points, Means, and Modes
    Hahl, Sayuri K.
    Kremling, Andreas
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2016, 7
  • [10] Deterministic and stochastic methods for sensitivity analysis of neutron noise
    Yamamoto, Toshihiro
    Sakamoto, Hiroki
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2022, 145