Prospective comparison of transient elastography, fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

被引:1951
|
作者
Castéra, L
Vergniol, J
Foucher, J
Le Bail, B
Chanteloup, E
Haaser, M
Darriet, M
Couzigou, P
De Lédinghen, V
机构
[1] CHU Bordeaux, Hop Haut Leveque, Serv Hepatogastroenterol, F-33604 Pessac, France
[2] CHU Bordeaux, Hop Pellegrin, Serv Anatomopathol, F-33604 Pessac, France
[3] CHU Bordeaux, Hop Pellegrin, Biochim Lab, F-33604 Pessac, France
[4] Univ Victor Segalen, INSERM E362, IFR66, Bordeaux, France
关键词
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.018
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Transient elastography (FibroScan; Echosens, Paris, France) is a novel, noninvasive, and rapid bedside method to assess liver fibrosis by measuring liver stiffness. We prospectively assessed the performance of FibroScan in patients with chronic hepatitis C, in comparison with and combined with currently available biochemical markers (Fibrotest; Biopredictive; and the aspartate transaminase to platelets ratio index [APRI]); a liver biopsy examination performed the same day served as the reference. Methods: We studied 183 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C (METAVIR fibrosis stage F1, n = 47; F2, n = 53; F3, n = 37; F4, n = 46). Results: FibroScan values ranged from 2.4 to 75.4 kilopascals (median, 7.4 kilopascals). Cut-off values were 7.1 kPa for F greater than or equal to 2, 9.5 kPa for F greater than or equal to 3, and 12.5 kPa for F = 4. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of FibroScan, FibroTest, and APRI values were of the same order (.83,.85, and .78, respectively, for F greater than or equal to 2; .90, .90, and .84, respectively, for F greater than or equal to 3; and .95, .87, and .83, respectively, for F = 4). The best performance was obtained by combining the FibroScan and FibroTest, with areas under the ROC curve of .88 for F greater than or equal to 2,.95 for F greater than or equal to 3, and .95 for F = 4. When the FibroScan and FibroTest results agreed, liver biopsy examination confirmed them in 84% of cases for F greater than or equal to 2, in 95% for F greater than or equal to 3, and in 94% for F = 4. Conclusions: FibroScan is a simple and effective method for assessing liver fibrosis, with similar performance to FibroTest and APRI. The combined use of FibroScan and FibroTest to evaluate liver fibrosis could avoid a biopsy procedure in most patients with chronic hepatitis C.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 350
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective comparison of transient elastography and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection
    Abdelmaksoud, Ahmed H. K.
    Taha, Mohamed El Sayed
    El Kassas, Mohamed
    Mahdy, Reem E.
    Mohamed, Gamal El-Din Esmat
    Samy, Hany Ahmed
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 46 (02): : 293 - 297
  • [2] Transient elastography (FibroScan®) a novel, non-invasive sensitive method for the assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.: A prospective evaluation in comparison with liver biopsy, Fibrotest and APRI.
    Castera, L
    Vergniol, J
    Foucher, J
    Le Bail, B
    Chanteloup, E
    Haaser, M
    Le Provost, N
    Couzigou, P
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 40 (04) : 679A - 679A
  • [3] NON-INVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF LIVER FIBROSIS IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS B AND C PATIENTS: A COMPARISON OF THE GALACTOSE - AND METHACETIN BREATH TESTS, THE SERUM MARKERS HYALURONIC ACID, APRI AND FIBROTEST AND TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY TO LIVER BIOPSY
    Stibbe, Krista J.
    Verveer, Claudia
    Francke, Jan
    Hansen, Bettina E.
    Zondervan, Pieter E.
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    de Knegt, Robert J.
    van Vuuren, Anneke J.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 50 (04) : 1062A - 1063A
  • [4] Predictive Performance of FIB 4 and APRI for Liver Fibrosis Assessment in Hepatitis C in Comparison to Transient Elastography
    Matta, Bassem
    Wilder, Julius
    Lee, Tzu-Hao
    Patel, Keyur
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S885 - S885
  • [5] Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in children with chronic hepatitis C: Shear wave elastography and APRI versus liver biopsy
    Galal, Shereen M.
    Soror, Shaban M.
    Hussien, Omima
    Moustafa, Ehab F.
    Hassany, Sahar M.
    [J]. ARAB JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 21 (04) : 253 - 259
  • [6] Noninvasive prediction of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: prospective comparison of Lok index, Fibroscan, Fibrotest and APRI with liver biopsy
    Castera, L.
    Foucher, J.
    Le Bail, B.
    Bernard, R.
    Bertet, J.
    Couzigou, P.
    De Ledinghen, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2006, 36 : S173 - S173
  • [7] Predictive value of APRI and FIB4 scores for liver fibrosis assessment in comparison to Transient Elastography in chronic hepatitis C patients
    Matta, Bassem
    Wilder, Julius M.
    Lee, Tzu-Hao
    Patel, Keyur
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 62 : 1129A - 1130A
  • [8] Assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis: comparison of shear wave elastography and transient elastography
    Paul, Shashi B.
    Das, Prasenjit
    Mahanta, Mousumi
    Sreenivas, Vishnubhatla
    Kedia, Saurabh
    Kalra, Nancy
    Kaur, Harpreet
    Vijayvargiya, Maneesh
    Ghosh, Shouriyo
    Gamanagatti, Shivanand R.
    Shalimar
    Gupta, Siddhartha Dutta
    Acharya, Subrat K.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (12) : 2864 - 2873
  • [9] ASSESSING FIBROSIS IN THE a→POST LIVER BIOPSY ERAa→™ OF HEPATITIS C TREATMENT: A COMPARISON OF APRI, FIB-4, FIBROTEST, AND SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY (SWE)
    Ortega, Amber J.
    Wallace, Danelle
    Ramers, Christian B.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 152 (05) : S1172 - S1172
  • [10] Assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis: comparison of shear wave elastography and transient elastography
    Shashi B. Paul
    Prasenjit Das
    Mousumi Mahanta
    Vishnubhatla Sreenivas
    Saurabh Kedia
    Nancy Kalra
    Harpreet Kaur
    Maneesh Vijayvargiya
    Shouriyo Ghosh
    Shivanand R. Gamanagatti
    Siddhartha Dutta Shalimar
    Subrat K. Gupta
    [J]. Abdominal Radiology, 2017, 42 : 2864 - 2873