Comparing Perimenstrual and Nonperimenstrual Migraine Attacks Using an e-Diary

被引:28
|
作者
van Casteren, Daphne S. [1 ,3 ]
Verhagen, Iris E. [1 ,3 ]
van der Arend, Britt W. H. [1 ,3 ]
van Zwet, Erik W. [2 ]
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette [3 ]
Terwindt, Gisela M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Div Vasc Med & Pharmacol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
CORTICAL SPREADING DEPRESSION; MENSTRUAL MIGRAINE; PREMENSTRUAL-SYNDROME; HORMONAL FACTORS; SEX-DIFFERENCES; HEADACHE; WOMEN; PREVALENCE; MODULATION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1212/WNL.0000000000012723
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives Endogenous and exogenous female sex hormones are considered important contributors to migraine pathophysiology. Previous studies have cautiously suggested that perimenstrual migraine attacks have a longer duration and are associated with higher disability compared to nonperimenstrual attacks, but they showed conflicting results on acute therapy efficacy, pain intensity, and associated symptoms. We compared perimenstrual and nonperimenstrual migraine attack characteristics and assessed premenstrual syndrome (PMS) in women with migraine. Methods Women with migraine were invited to complete a headache e-diary. Characteristics of perimenstrual attacks and nonperimenstrual attacks were compared. The primary outcome was attack duration. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity, accompanying symptoms, acute medication intake, and pain coping. Mixed effects models were used to account for multiple attacks within patients. PMS was assessed in patients without hormonal contraceptives. Subgroup analyses were performed for women with menstrually related migraine (MRM) and nonmenstrually related migraine (non-MRM) and women with a natural menstrual cycle and women using hormonal contraceptives. Results A representative group of 500 participants completed the e-diary for at least 1 month. Perimenstrual migraine attacks (n = 998) compared with nonperimenstrual attacks (n = 4097) were associated with longer duration (20.0 vs 16.1 hours, 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.4), higher recurrence risk (odds ratio [OR] 2.4 [2.0-2.9]), increased triptan intake (OR 1.2 [1.1-1.4]), higher headache intensity (OR 1.4 [1.2-1.7]), less pain coping (mean difference -0.2 [-0.3 to -0.1]), more pronounced photophobia (OR 1.3 [1.2-1.4]) and phonophobia (OR 1.2 [1.1-1.4]), and less aura (OR 0.8 [0.6-1.0]). In total, 396/500 women completed the diary for >= 3 consecutive menstrual cycles, of whom 56% (221/396) fulfilled MRM criteria. Differences in attack characteristics became more pronounced when focusing on women with MRM and women using hormonal contraceptives. Prevalence of PMS was not different for women with MRM compared to non-MRM (11% vs 15%). Discussion The longer duration of perimenstrual migraine attacks in women (with MRM) is associated with higher recurrence risk and increased triptan use. This may increase the risk of medication overuse and emphasizes the need to develop female-specific prophylactic treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:E1661 / E1671
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defining migraine days, based on longitudinal E-diary data
    van der Arend, Britt W. H.
    Verhagen, Iris E.
    van Leeuwen, Matthijs
    van der Arend, Marnick Q. T. P.
    van Casteren, Daphne S.
    Terwindt, Gisela M.
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2023, 43 (05)
  • [2] Sex differences in migraine attack characteristics: A longitudinal E-diary study
    Verhagen, Iris E.
    van der Arend, Britt W. H.
    van Casteren, Daphne S.
    le Cessie, Saskia
    MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
    Terwindt, Gisela M.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2023, 63 (03): : 333 - 341
  • [3] Differences Between Perimenstrual Migraine Attacks and Migraine Attacks at Other Times of the Cycle
    MacGregor, E. Anne
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2021, 97 (17) : E1753 - E1756
  • [4] E-DIARY COMPLIANCE IN ACUTE PAIN STUDIES
    Marino, B.
    Platko, J.
    Raymond, S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A642 - A642
  • [5] Application of E-diary to analyze the effectiveness of learning
    Gogh, Elod
    Kovacs, Attila
    Sziladi, Gergely
    [J]. 2017 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFOCOMMUNICATIONS (COGINFOCOM), 2017, : 419 - 423
  • [6] Dear e-diary, who am I really?
    Anderson, Alun
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 2010, 208 (2792) : 36 - 37
  • [7] Validation of an E-diary System for Assessing Physical Activities
    Zhu, Weimo
    Hasegawa-Johnson, Mark
    Roth, Dan
    Kantor, Arthur
    Gao, Yong
    Gandhi, Mital A.
    Park, Youngsik
    Yang, Lin
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S102 - S103
  • [8] Both perimenstrual and nonperimenstrual migraine days respond to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (receptor) antibodies
    Verhagen, Iris E.
    Lentsch, Simone de Vries
    van Der Arend, Britt W. H.
    le Cessie, Saskia
    MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
    Terwindt, Gisela M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 30 (07) : 2117 - 2121
  • [9] E-diary: a digital tool for strengthening accountability in agricultural extension
    Namyenya, Angella
    Daum, Thomas
    Rwamigisa, Patience B.
    Birner, Regina
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 28 (02) : 319 - 345
  • [10] Modeling seizure self-prediction: An e-diary study
    Haut, Sheryl R.
    Hall, Charles B.
    Borkowski, Thomas
    Tennen, Howard
    Lipton, Richard B.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2013, 54 (11) : 1960 - 1967