Enteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region: A meta-analysis

被引:49
|
作者
Congio, Guilhermo Francklin de Souza [1 ,2 ]
Bannink, Andre [3 ]
Mogollon, Olga Lucia Mayorga [1 ]
Hristov, Alexander Nikolov [4 ]
机构
[1] AGROSAVIA, Colombian Corp Agr Res, Bogota 250047, DC, Colombia
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Dept Anim Sci, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[3] Wageningesn Univ & Res, Wageningen Livestock Res, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, 335 Agr Sci & Ind Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Enteric methane; Mitigation; Cattle; Sheep; Greenhouse gas emissions; Global warming; DRY-MATTER INTAKE; CONTROLLED-RELEASE CAPSULES; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; MAXIMUM CV-MOMBACA; RUMEN FERMENTATION; LEUCAENA-LEUCOCEPHALA; MILK-PRODUCTION; HERBAGE ACCUMULATION; ROTATIONAL STOCKING; CONDENSED TANNINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) is a developing region characterized for its importance for global food security, producing 23 and 11% of the global beef and milk production, respectively. The region's ruminant livestock sector however, is under scrutiny on environmental grounds due to its large contribution to enteric methane (CH4) emissions and influence on global climate change. Thus, the identification of effective CH4 mitigation strategies which do not compromise animal performance is urgently needed, especially in context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) defined in the Paris Agreement of the United Nations. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to: 1) collate a database of individual sheep, beef and dairy cattle records from enteric CH4 emission studies conducted in the LAC region, and 2) perform a meta-analysis to identify feasible enteric CH4 mitigation strategies, which do not compromise animal performance. After outlier's removal, 2745 animal records (65% of the original data) from 103 studies were retained (from 2011 to 2021) in the LAC database. Potential mitigation strategies were classified into three main categories (i.e., animal breeding, dietary, and rumen manipulation) and up to three subcategories, totaling 34 evaluated strategies. A random effects model weighted by inverse variance was used (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3.3.070). Six strategies decreased at least one enteric CH4 metric and simultaneously increased milk yield (MY; dairy cattle) or average daily gain (ADG; beef cattle and sheep). The breed composition F1 Holstein x Gyr decreased CH4 emission per MY (CH4IMilk) while increasing MY by 99%. Adequate strategies of grazing management under continuous and rotational stocking decreased CH4 emission per ADG (CH4IGain) by 22 and 35%, while increasing ADG by 22 and 71%, respectively. Increased dietary protein concentration, and increased concentrate level through cottonseed meal inclusion, decreased CH4IMilk and CH4IGain by 10 and 20% and increased MY and ADG by 12 and 31%, respectively. Lastly, increased feeding level decreased CH4IGain by 37%, while increasing ADG by 171%. The identified effective mitigation strategies can be adopted by livestock producers according to their specific needs and aid LAC countries in achieving SDG as defined in the Paris Agreement.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantifying the Impact of Different Dietary Rumen Modulating Strategies on Enteric Methane Emission and Productivity in Ruminant Livestock: A Meta-Analysis
    Pepeta, Bulelani N.
    Hassen, Abubeker
    Tesfamariam, Eyob H.
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (05):
  • [2] A Review of 3-Nitrooxypropanol for Enteric Methane Mitigation from Ruminant Livestock
    Yu, Guanghui
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Dong, Ruilan
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [3] MitiGate; an online meta-analysis database for quantification of mitigation strategies for enteric methane emissions
    Veneman, Jolien B.
    Saetnan, Eli R.
    Clare, Amanda J.
    Newbold, Charles J.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 572 : 1166 - 1174
  • [4] Impact of methane mitigation strategies on the native ruminant microbiome: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Frazier, A. Nathan
    Belk, Aeriel D.
    Beck, Matthew R.
    Koziel, Jacek A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [5] Mitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies
    Caro, Dario
    Kebreab, Ermias
    Mitloehner, Frank M.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2016, 137 (3-4) : 467 - 480
  • [6] Mitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies
    Dario Caro
    Ermias Kebreab
    Frank M. Mitloehner
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2016, 137 : 467 - 480
  • [7] Ruminant contribution to enteric methane emissions and possible mitigation strategies in the Southern Africa Development Community region
    Mompoloki Seketeme
    Othusitse R. Madibela
    Thabo Khumoetsile
    Innocent Rugoho
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2022, 27
  • [8] In vitro evaluation of enteric methane mitigation strategies: A meta-analysis.
    Martins, L. F.
    Congio, G. F. S.
    Cueva, S. F.
    Lage, C. F. A.
    Ramin, M.
    Silvestre, T.
    Tricarico, J.
    Hristov, A. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 : 310 - 310
  • [9] Ruminant contribution to enteric methane emissions and possible mitigation strategies in the Southern Africa Development Community region
    Seketeme, Mompoloki
    Madibela, Othusitse R.
    Khumoetsile, Thabo
    Rugoho, Innocent
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 27 (07)
  • [10] Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions
    Patra, Amlan Kumar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2012, 184 (04) : 1929 - 1952