Exploring the Dynamics of Latent Variable Models

被引:18
|
作者
Reuning, Kevin [1 ]
Kenwick, Michael R. [2 ]
Fariss, Christopher J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Polit Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
关键词
latent variables; dynamic modeling; Bayesian analysis; HUMAN-RIGHTS; CHANGING STANDARD; DEMOCRACY; PARTY;
D O I
10.1017/pan.2019.1
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Researchers face a tradeoff when applying latent variable models to time-series, cross-sectional data. Static models minimize bias but assume data are temporally independent, resulting in a loss of efficiency. Dynamic models explicitly model temporal data structures, but smooth estimates of the latent trait across time, resulting in bias when the latent trait changes rapidly. We address this tradeoff by investigating a new approach for modeling and evaluating latent variable estimates: a robust dynamic model. The robust model is capable of minimizing bias and accommodating volatile changes in the latent trait. Simulations demonstrate that the robust model outperforms other models when the underlying latent trait is subject to rapid change, and is equivalent to the dynamic model in the absence of volatility. We reproduce latent estimates from studies of judicial ideology and democracy. For judicial ideology, the robust model uncovers shocks in judicial voting patterns that were not previously identified in the dynamic model. For democracy, the robust model provides more precise estimates of sudden institutional changes such as the imposition of martial law in the Philippines (1972-1981) and the short-lived Saur Revolution in Afghanistan (1978). Overall, the robust model is a useful alternative to the standard dynamic model for modeling latent traits that change rapidly over time.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 517
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Latent Variable Models for Uncovering Motor Cortical Ensemble Dynamics
    Chen, Zhe
    Liu, Shizhao
    Iriate-Diaz, Jose
    Hatsopoulos, Nicholas G.
    Ross, Callum F.
    Takahashi, Kazutaka
    [J]. 2017 FIFTY-FIRST ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTERS, 2017, : 331 - 335
  • [2] Latent variable models
    Bishop, CM
    [J]. LEARNING IN GRAPHICAL MODELS, 1998, 89 : 371 - 403
  • [3] Latent variable and latent structure models
    von Eye, A
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY-APA REVIEW OF BOOKS, 2004, 49 (02): : 204 - 204
  • [4] Latent variable and latent structure models
    Bunting, B
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 56 : 184 - 185
  • [5] Latent variable models are network models
    Molenaar, Peter C. M.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2010, 33 (2-3) : 166 - +
  • [6] Latent variable and latent structure models.
    Glaser, DN
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2003, 10 (01) : 165 - 174
  • [7] Discrete Latent Variable Models
    Bartolucci, Francesco
    Pandolfi, Silvia
    Pennoni, Fulvia
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, 2022, 9 : 425 - 452
  • [8] Dimension in latent variable models
    Levine, MV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 47 (04) : 450 - 466
  • [9] Tensors and Latent Variable Models
    Ishteva, Mariya
    [J]. LATENT VARIABLE ANALYSIS AND SIGNAL SEPARATION, LVA/ICA 2015, 2015, 9237 : 49 - 55
  • [10] CONTINUITY OF LATENT VARIABLE MODELS
    WILLEMS, JC
    NIEUWENHUIS, JW
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1991, 36 (05) : 528 - 538