Prediction of Reduced Gait Speed Using 5-Time Sit-to-Stand Test in Healthy Older Adults

被引:5
|
作者
Carvalho de Abreu, Daniela Cristina [1 ]
Porto, Jaqueline Mello [1 ]
Tofani, Patricia Silva [2 ]
Brunelli Braghin, Roberta de Matos [1 ]
Freire Junior, Renato Campos [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Rehabil & Funct Performance Program, Physiotherapy Course,Dept Hlth Sci, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Sergipe UFS, Dept Physiotherapy, Lagarto, Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Amazonas UFAM, Fac Phys Educ & Physiotherapy, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Physical function; walking speed; primary care; PERFORMANCE; PEOPLE; FALLS; TASK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.002
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the accuracy of the 5-time stand-to-sit (5TSTS) test for the identification of older adults with reduced gait speed. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting and Participants: A total of 559 community-dwelling older adults were included in the study, divided into groups of women (n = 465) and men (n = 94). Methods: 5TSTS and gait speed were assessed. Multiple linear regression analysis with adjustment was performed in order to determine the association between 5TSTS and gait speed, followed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the identification of the usefulness of 5TSTS to discriminate older adults with reduced gait speed. Based on the ROC curve, we identified the area under the curve, the sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff points of the 5TSST. Statistical analyses were made using the SPSS software (version 25.0), and a significance level of 5% (P <= .05) was adopted. Results: The 5TSTS showed correlation with gait speed. Additionally, 5TSTS was able to discriminate reduced gait speed with moderate accuracy (P <.05; AUC between 0.7 and 0.8). For women, the cutoff scores for 5TSTS to identify gait speed < 0.8 m/s was 14.15 seconds; for gait speed <1.0 m/s, it was 12.67 seconds. For men, the cutoff scores for 5TSTS to identify gait speed <0.8 m/s was 14.67 seconds, and for gait speed <1.0 m/s, it was 13.63 seconds. Conclusion and Implications: The 5TSTS is clinically useful and can be an alternative assessment for discriminating community-dwelling older adults with reduced gait speed, when the gait evaluation is not feasible. The study also suggests different cutoff values for 5TSTS considering the gait speeds <0.8 and <1.0 m/s for older women and men, respectively. (C) 2021 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 892
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Instrumented 5-Time Sit-To-Stand Test: Parameters Predicting Serious Falls beyond the Duration of the Test
    Atrsaei, Arash
    Paraschiv-Ionescu, Anisoara
    Krief, Helene
    Henchoz, Yves
    Santos-Eggimann, Brigitte
    Buela, Christophe
    Aminian, Kamiar
    GERONTOLOGY, 2022, 68 (05) : 587 - 600
  • [2] Reliability and concurrent validity of 30-s and 5-time sit-to-stand tests in older adults with knee osteoarthritis
    Khuna, Lalita
    Soison, Tussaneeporn
    Plukwongchuen, Theardkhwan
    Tangadulrat, Napaporn
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 43 (06) : 2035 - 2045
  • [3] Comparison of available equations to estimate sit-to-stand muscle power and their association with gait speed and frailty in older people: Practical applications for the 5-rep sit-to-stand test
    Baltasar-Fernandez, Ivan
    Alcazar, Julian
    Losa-Reyna, Jose
    Soto-Paniagua, Hector
    Alegre, Luis M.
    Takai, Yohei
    Ruiz-Cardenas, Juan D.
    Signorile, Joseph F.
    Rodriguez-Manas, Leocadio
    Garcia-Garcia, Francisco J.
    Ara, Ignacio
    EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY, 2021, 156
  • [4] Effect of Unweighting Assistance on Sit-to-Stand Mechanics in Healthy Older Adults
    Piersol, Kelsey L.
    Riemann, Bryan L.
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS, 2020, 38 (04) : 370 - 384
  • [5] The Instrumented Sit-to-Stand Test (iSTS) Has Greater Clinical Relevance than the Manually Recorded Sit-to-Stand Test in Older Adults
    van Lummel, Rob C.
    Walgaard, Stefan
    Maier, Andrea B.
    Ainsworth, Erik
    Beek, Peter J.
    van Dieen, Jaap H.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [6] Velocity of the Five Sit-to-Stand Test in Older Adults: A Systematic Review
    Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel
    Miranda-Fuentes, Claudia
    Perez-Doncel, Julieta
    Rool- Maureira, Barbara
    Saavedra-Rincon, Francisca
    Zambra-Alvarez, Rocio
    Intelangelo, Leonardo
    Guede-Roja, Francisco
    RETOS-NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EDUCACION FISICA DEPORTE Y RECREACION, 2022, (45): : 714 - 722
  • [7] Reliability of Recurrence Quantification Analysis Measures for Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit Activities in Healthy Older Adults Using Wearable Sensors
    Nasim, Amnah
    Nchekwube, David C.
    Kim, Yoon Sang
    ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (19)
  • [8] Modified 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test: Reliability and Validity in Older Adults Unable to Complete Traditional Sit-to-Stand Testing
    McAllister, Linda S.
    Palombaro, Kerstin M.
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2020, 43 (03) : 153 - 158
  • [9] Loaded 5 Sit-to-Stand Test to Determine the Force-Velocity Relationship in Older Adults: A Validation Study
    Bochicchio, Gianluca
    Ferrari, Luca
    Bottari, Alberto
    Lucertini, Francesco
    Cavedon, Valentina
    Milanese, Chiara
    Pogliaghi, Silvia
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (13):
  • [10] The role of thigh muscular efforts in limiting sit-to-stand capacity in healthy young and older adults
    Bryanton, Megan
    Bilodeau, Martin
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 29 (06) : 1211 - 1219