Comparative analysis of cost, emissions and fuel consumption of diesel, natural gas, electric and hydrogen urban buses

被引:40
|
作者
Munoz, Pedro [1 ]
Franceschini, Esteban A. [2 ]
Levitan, David [3 ]
Ramiro Rodriguez, C. [4 ]
Humana, Teresita [1 ]
Correa Perelmuter, Gabriel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Catamarca, Fac Ciencias Exactas & Nat, CONICET, CITCA, Prado 366,K4700BDH, San Fernando Del Valle D, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Fac Ciencias Quim, Dept Matemat & Fis, INFIQC,CONICET, Ciudad Univ, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
[3] ITHES CONICET UBA, Pabellon Ind,Ciudad Univ, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Fac Ciencias Exactas Fis & Nat, Av Velez Sarsfield 1611,X5016GCA, Cordoba, Argentina
关键词
Cost; Emissions; Energy efficiency; Diesel; Hydrogen; Battery; Bus fleet; WELL-TO-WHEEL; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CELL HYBRID; VEHICLES; TRANSPORTATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115412
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Within the context of the energy transition, there are several alternatives under study for the gradual replacement of diesel fuel based urban transport vehicles. This paper proposes an answer to the following question: Which bus technology and energy mix is more efficient in terms of cost, energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions? A method is proposed to compare different urban bus fleet technologies, using an integrated index composed of three indices that measure well-to-wheel energy use, global warming potential in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, and total cost of ownership. The method is applied to the case of Argentina, from the 2019 scenario to the year 2030, and the results for each index show that, (i) even for the current energy scenario, battery and hydrogen fuel cell buses show a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions; that (ii) today the compressed natural gas bus is a better mean of passenger transport for both urban and intercity uses (it could reduce the carbon dioxide equivalent emissions 10.07% and the total cost of ownership 5.3%); and that (iii) both battery and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles become cost competitive with compressed natural gas and diesel vehicles over the course of the current decade. In addition, (iv) the battery electric bus is shown to become the best option by 2023 and (v) the hydrogen fuel cell bus proves to be the best option from 2027 onwards. The transition of the entire urban bus fleet in Argentina to zero-emission technologies is expected to be beneficial from the point of view of energy consumption, environmental emissions and the economy. If transition of the whole fleet to Hydrogen fuel cell buses is carried out, 1.3 Mt of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions could be reduced, which represents a 87% reduction in green house gases emissions, and if the transition is to battery electric buses, the energy consumption would be reduced by between 25 and 38% and emissions by between 52 and 61% abating around 0.93 Mt of carbon dioxide equivalent per year.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lifecycle cost assessment and carbon dioxide emissions of diesel, natural gas, hybrid electric, fuel cell hybrid and electric transit buses
    Lajunen, Antti
    Lipman, Timothy
    ENERGY, 2016, 106 : 329 - 342
  • [2] Emissions and fuel consumption of natural gas powered city buses versus diesel buses in real-city traffic
    Pelkmans, L
    De Keukeleere, D
    Lenaers, G
    URBAN TRANSPORT VII: URBAN TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2001, 8 : 651 - 660
  • [3] Fuel consumption and exhaust emissions of urban buses: Performance of the new diesel technology
    Nylund, Nils-Olof
    Erkkila, Kimmo
    Hartikka, Tuukka
    VTT Tied Valt Tek Tutkimuskeskus, 2007, 2373 (1-48): : 1 - 48
  • [4] Fuel consumption and exhaust emissions of urban buses. Performance of newest diesel technology
    Nylund, Nils-Olof
    Erkkilä, Kimmo
    Hartikka, Tuukka
    VTT Tiedotteita - Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus, 2007, (2372): : 3 - 47
  • [5] Effects of passenger load, road grade, and congestion level on real-world fuel consumption and emissions from compressed natural gas and diesel urban buses
    Rosero, Fredy
    Fonseca, Natalia
    Lopez, Jose-Maria
    Casanova, Jesus
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 282 (282)
  • [6] A comparative life cycle assessment of electric, compressed natural gas, and diesel buses in Thailand
    Gabriel, Natalie R.
    Martin, Katherine K.
    Haslam, Samantha J.
    Faile, Julia C.
    Kamens, Richard M.
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 314
  • [7] Actual emissions from urban buses powered with diesel and gas engines
    Merkisz, Jerzy
    Fuc, Pawel
    Lijewski, Piotr
    Pielecha, Jacek
    TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 : 3070 - 3078
  • [8] Impact of Fuel Production Technologies on Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions from Diesel and Electric-Hydrogen Hybrid Buses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Padovan, Camila
    Fagundes, Julia A. G.
    D'Agosto, Marcio de Almeida
    Angelo, Ana Carolina M.
    Carneiro, Pedro J. P.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [9] Comparing real-world fuel consumption for diesel- and hydrogen-fueled transit buses and implication for emissions
    Frey, H. Christopher
    Rouphail, Nagui M.
    Zhai, Haibo
    Farias, Tiago L.
    Goncalves, Goncalo A.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 12 (04) : 281 - 291
  • [10] Comparison of Life Cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of natural gas, biodiesel and diesel buses of the Madrid transportation system
    Garcia Sanchez, Juan Antonio
    Lopez Martinez, Jose Maria
    Lumbreras Martin, Julio
    Flores Holgado, Maria Nuria
    ENERGY, 2012, 47 (01) : 174 - 198