Language Learning Strategies Used by Successful and Unsuccessful Iranian EFL Students

被引:23
|
作者
Gerami, Mohammad Hossein [1 ]
Baighlou, Shiva Madani Ghareh [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept English Literature, Soofian Branch, Soofian, Iran
关键词
Language Learning Strategies (LLS); Successful EFL Students; Unsuccessful EFL Students; ENGLISH; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.399
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The important part language learning strategies play in second language acquisition(SLA) has been noted by many SLA researchers and also, many studies have been conducted to explore them (Rubin, 1975 and 1981; Naiman et al, 1978; O'Malley et al, 1985 and 1990; Ellis, 1985; Oxford, 1990 and Cohen, 2000). Since language is socially mediated and context dependent, it would be expected that learners' use of language learning strategies may vary with the environment. This study examines the application of language learning strategies by successful and unsuccessful Iranian EFL students. To do so, memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective and social language learning strategies were investigated. To collect data, the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL; Oxford, 1990) was administered to successful and unsuccessful EFL students. They, then, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The findings of the study indicated that successful EFL students used a wider range of learning strategies and different from those often preferred by their unsuccessful peers. The former often used metacognitive strategies while the latter tended to use surface level cognitive strategies. The results of this study can be beneficial for Iranian language teachers in terms of raising their awareness on narrowing the gap between the students' language learning strategies and their teaching methodologies preferences. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Dr Zafer Bekirogullari.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE TYPE OF VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY EFL IRANIAN STUDENTS
    Rouhani, Marjan
    [J]. MODERN JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS, 2016, 6 (06): : 365 - 374
  • [2] Comparison of learning strategies in successful and unsuccessful students
    Fathi-Ashtiani, Ali
    Hasani, Maryam
    Nabipoor-Ashrafi, S. Mahdi
    Ejei, Javad
    Azadfallah, Parviz
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 3 (02) : 164 - 169
  • [3] Language Learning Strategy Preferences of Iranian EFL Students
    Nikoopour, Jahanbakhsh
    Farsani, Mohammad Amini
    Neishabouri, Jahangir Kashefi
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITY, PT TWO, 2011, 5 : 356 - +
  • [4] Language learning strategies used by EFL students: Does their digital fluency matter?
    Lee, Jia-Ying
    [J]. LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2023,
  • [5] LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL VOCATIONAL TRAINEES IN ALGERIA
    Anber, N.
    Hemeche, H.
    [J]. 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI 2012), 2012, : 3504 - 3514
  • [6] Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese universities
    Gan, ZD
    Humphreys, G
    Hamp-Lyons, L
    [J]. MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2004, 88 (02): : 229 - 244
  • [7] A Deep Look into Learning Strategy Use by Successful and Unsuccessful Students in the Chinese EFL Learning Context
    Ni Qingquan
    Chatupote, Monta
    Teo, Adisa
    [J]. RELC JOURNAL, 2008, 39 (03) : 338 - 358
  • [8] Comparative Study of Language Learning Strategies of Spoken English between Successful and Unsuccessful Students in Vocational College
    Kun, Li
    [J]. 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION INNOVATION (EBMEI 2013), VOL 18, 2013, 18 : 133 - 136
  • [9] Assessment of language learning strategies used by Palestinian EFL learners
    Khalil, A
    [J]. FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2005, 38 (01) : 108 - 119
  • [10] LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND PROGRESS IN EFL OF STUDENTS OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS
    Pasalic, Magda
    [J]. ESP TODAY-JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AT TERTIARY LEVEL, 2013, 1 (01): : 127 - 138